Is there some difference between mv and {cp + rm the old file} on Unix?

Question

a) mv a b

b) cp a b;rm a

These are two sets of statements. Is there some difference between what they do?

Answer 1

Assuming the files involved are on the same file system, then mv simply changes pointers in the file system, whereas cp copies the entire contents of the file, and rm once again changes pointers. So mv is far more efficient.

Answer 2

Yes, mv has a chance of being atomic on the same disk, whereas the combination of cp and rm never has.

This is assuming that mv is implemented using rename(), which is the call that has the guarantee. See, for instance, this newsgroup post, which quotes POSIX:

This rename() function is equivalent for regular files to that defined by the ISO C standard. Its inclusion here expands that definition to include actions on directories and specifies behavior when the new parameter names a file that already exists. That specification requires that the action of the function be atomic.

Answer 3

When the source and the destination are on the same physical volume, then the first approach is simply a rename and is very fast (even if the file(s) are very big).

cp & rm will always have to load/store all the data, even if it weren't necessary.

Answer 4

On the same file system mv changes the directory reference, pointing to the same inode (file data and metadata) thus:

• is an atomic operation (it cannot be interrupted by another process file operation)
• takes only a trivial amount of additional disk space (the additional name in the directory)
• preserves file permissions and ownership
• can be much faster, depending on amount of data

Copy and remove

• is not atomic (another process could interfere between the cp and rm commands)
• requires storing the file data twice on disk for a short period (between the cp and rm commands)
• changes file permissions and ownership to defaults
• can be much slower or even fail, depending on amount of data

Answer 5

mv is in essence a "rename" operation. This means the file itself is left in the same spot on disk. No actual file operation is performed.

Answer 6

Yes.

mv simply changes the filesystem metadata on the file relating to it's name and location, whereas cp creates a seperate copy of the file, which takes much longer as it must fully read the first file and then write it's contents to another file

Answer 7

cp and rm is a much heavier on the disk usage, and may fail for disk space reasons.

Answer 8

The difference is that mv conserves file-attributes while cp by default doesn't, for example setting creation-date to the current date.

To override this default, use "cp -p" to preserve the last data modification, the time of the last access, the user ID and group ID (only if it has permissions to do this), file permission bits and the SUID and SGID bits.