Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why doesn't Mac OSX have something like Synaptics built in to allow easy installation of third party applications? Ports seems to be a bit of a mess and doesn't always seem to work

share|improve this question
What doesn't work? I've rarely had problems with it (outside of dealing with a perl install). – skarface Jan 30 '10 at 19:29
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Maybe something like Porticus might help?


Feel free to post specific port-related questions as we seem to have a few MacPorts members here. Otherwise the MacPorts mailing lists are also very useful. One major difference between Synaptic and MacPorts is that MacPorts is only source-based, with no binary packages by default.

Hope this helps!

share|improve this answer
Amazing, I never knew about this! Thanks – Zubair Jan 30 '10 at 18:35
Great. I'm assuming that you have been able to successfully install the MacPorts base system at least? Otherwise Porticus is not going to solve your "bit of a mess" as you stated in your question. – fideli Jan 30 '10 at 18:42
I installed MacPorts, but got a cryptic error message when trying to install erlang from the GUI. In the end I just did "port install erlang" from the command line and it worked. – Zubair Feb 3 '10 at 20:24

Ports isn't exactly part of of OS X, but already a 3rd party software you install.

As for front-ends, in addition to Porticus you could also check out Pallet, though the last time I tried it it seemed rather unstable.

share|improve this answer
Ack, please don't link to – fideli Feb 17 '10 at 6:01

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.