Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Are color laser printers good enough to print photos? Or they too expensive and produces low quality photos?

share|improve this question

closed as too broad by Journeyman Geek May 15 '14 at 10:47

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

For consumer or professional level? For how much printing? – Troggy Jul 21 '09 at 18:16
To print a lot of photo at home. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Jul 21 '09 at 18:20
Let's say 300 per month. – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Jul 21 '09 at 18:21
up vote 8 down vote accepted

Laser printers are great for speed and "business graphics" (think pie charts). For the rich color and glossy finish of photos you'll want an ink-based solution. When compared side-by-side the ink/bubblejet print will beat out the laser print every time.

For the best results try for a 4-color process (separate Cyan, Magenta, Yellow and Black cartridges) printer with a native resolution over 1440 dpi.

I've had decent luck with Epsons and HPs. I have heard good things about Canons but have not owned one myself.

share|improve this answer
I'm still waiting for a good "hybrid": laser for most prints and some of the black coloring of the photo, ink for full color and photos. – Joel Coehoorn Jul 21 '09 at 19:12
@Joel - Lasers do produce a stunning black. I had to print brochures with a color photo on the front off a laser and while it looked decent, printing the same brochure on an ink jet made the colors more lifelike. But damn the text look good on the laser version. A hybrid would rock. – Rob Allen Jul 21 '09 at 19:20
@RobAllen Are you saying besides black and white printing, inkjets pwn lasers? (quality) – Pacerier May 17 '12 at 22:14
@Pacerier - Not exactly. It isn't that simple. When consumer and business lasers lay down a bunch of toner in a small space (like a photo) it has a thick matte finish to it, so color photos lose their shine, clarity and color definition. If you are producing a block of a single color like the charts I mentioned, or a logo, or other color application that doesn't have the complexity of a photo, Laser is hard to beat. You also have other factors in Laser's favor like speed and efficiency – Rob Allen May 19 '12 at 15:13

Did you buy a printer yet? You might look into the dye-sub printers. There are several for making 6x4in prints. The output is indistinguishable from photographic, though the color does not pop quite as much. For larger prints, the Phaser line of printers are decent, though pricey.

Edit: I do not wish to promote any particular 6x4in printer model, but Google does list such printers with the search term dye sub photo printer .

Xerox has a list of Phaser dye sub printers here, along with a sales blurb on the benefits of solid ink. The Phasers can easily handle a 100 prints a day. Kodak also has some interesting printers, though I've never used them or seen their output.

share|improve this answer
Any link for concrete model? – Kirill V. Lyadvinsky Nov 25 '09 at 15:00

From what I've found, no they are not good enough for decent photo prints. If you want to print at home, I would suggest the Epson PictureMate. It only does 4x6 printing, but the quality/value ratio is quite good.

share|improve this answer

If you're willing to invest in a laser printer (more than $500), it can produce decent prints, and last longer.

Before you buy, pay attention to the printer's density, measured in dpi (you'll want at least 300dpi ). Also, always ask to try the printer.

share|improve this answer
300 DPI will not produce good Picture quality. – Move More Comments Link To Top Oct 15 '09 at 20:52
300 DPI is reasonably good for text, but you want a lot higher for photos. – David Thornley Oct 15 '09 at 21:30
There is DPI and then there is PPI. The old fashioned prints from the film processor used approximately 300 PPI output onto photo paper. An inkjet will need considerably more DPI than PPI due to the dithering process to produce color. – casualuser Nov 24 '09 at 1:56

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .