Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm wondering if anyone here has experience with Prosumer/High-End Video Editing? So far I use Adobe Premiere CS4, but it is an unstable and buggy mess sadly. This could be partially caused by the fact that my input material isn't always pure HDV/AVCHD but sometimes it can be DivX or some already pre-processed video.

The one thing I liked about Adobe is though that with After Effects and Encore, they have a good overall toolset, but if it's sub-par then it's no good. Luckily it is already paid for and was worth it's money overall, so It's not a complete waste of money.

But are there alternatives? Especially After Effects is quite unique, and the closest thing I found is Apple's Final Cut Studio which includes Motion and DVD Studio. The two downsides is that it requires a Mac and that it doesn't support BluRay though.

Any hints for Windows? Sony Vegas might be something I'll look at, but I'm guessing I have to keep using After Effects for some serious compositing/VFX?

share|improve this question
    
Lightworks -- the amazing professional NLE of <s>$2000</s> $0 that went [or will go?] Open Source. –  muntoo Jul 18 '12 at 21:31

2 Answers 2

Well, if you want the industry standard "professional" video suite, you'll need to switch to Avid. I've never used it, so I can't comment on how well it works, but it is still the de facto industry standard.

Sony Vegas is a bit of a mixed metaphor. It does editing and compositing, but it just doesn't work quite the way you expect it to work. The work-flow is just qa bit off from what you'll be used to coming from another editor. You can still create video with it, though. But as for its' compositing abilities, it is nowhere close to AfterEffects.

As for Premiere... I produced a cable television program for 4 years with Premiere 5.1, and while it had its' issues, it worked.

My overall experience with video editing software/systems is that you need to put a lot more time/effort/consideration into creating a stable software+hardware environment. Which means paying a lot more attention to hardware compatibility issues, giving yourself a lot of hardware headroom, choosing the best video resolutions & formats, tuning your operating system for best performance, using a solid performing video converter, etc. The more "professional" the desired outcome, the more important it is to consider these factors.

As for dealing with your video formats, Premiere may be choking on having mixed formats on a time line. If you are creating long-form videos, I would find a format that Premiere prefers that meets your requirements, and convert to that format during the capture process. Run the video through a converter, or use a decent video camera that does conversion input/output. If you are doing short-form videos, such as television commercials, do the same for captured video, and use AfterEffects to transcode shorter clips to your needed format. And while AE is a compositor, for a short enough final result, theres no reason that you couldn't edit with it. The ability to layer video and set in/out points on a time line pretty much sums up the fundamental ability of both Premiere & AE.

share|improve this answer

Last year Lifehacker did a survey of video editors. Premiere and Final Cut Pro came out on top, but there are other options.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.