Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I need to run three machines as a cluster at home and want maximum performance from them, running an Erlang program.

What is the best OS to use for this?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by 8088, slhck, Diago Sep 30 '11 at 7:02

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
if it were me, i'd stick with Linux (I'm more familiar with it), although i'd prefer Debian over Ubuntu for this sort of thing. i really don't know much about Erlang, tho, and how your program would exercise the hardware. there might be some advantages to using Solaris or FreeBSD for this. –  quack quixote Feb 6 '10 at 10:29

2 Answers 2

up vote 4 down vote accepted

I'm running both an Ubuntu server and a FreeBSD server headless. The FreeBSD one sits here in a cabinet, the Ubuntu one in a co-lo facility.

The difference is negligible, both are easy enough to administer via ssh if you know what you're doing. At the end of the day it boils down to what you're most familiar with because being able to come up with an optimal hardware/software combo and administer that will make a far bigger impact on the overall performance than your choice of OS.

share|improve this answer

I'd say which ever you feel the most skilled with to automated/optimize/administrate.

share|improve this answer
    
Ah, ok. Well, I wasn't sure if there was an obvious choice OS, as I'm about the same level in all three. Of course, Solaris has the advantage because of ZFS, but other than that I didn't know which to go for. –  Zubair Feb 6 '10 at 10:04
    
Sure ZFS is very nice, but do you need it? ext4 does a really good job for most of what you might want to do. You'll probably get more choice of packaged programs and support with Ubuntu. –  ℝaphink Feb 6 '10 at 10:21
    
I wanted ZFS as it is the cheapest filesystem to maintain in my time with using filesystems (never have to worry about corruption - so far ;) I have had problems with ext4 on a couple of Ubuntu 9 machines where I previously has FreeBSD and ZFS. I don't know if it was jsut bad luck though, but going back to FreeBSD and the machines were running fine again. –  Zubair Feb 9 '10 at 12:40

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.