Why would I use it over VMware, KVM?
feedback
|
closed as not constructive by random♦ Jan 19 '11 at 6:04
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
It's free, open source (GPL), multi platform and seems to work rather well. | |||||||||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
It has good performance, nice seamless support, is free for Personal Use. And there is even an open-source version if your not using it for personal use. Although the open source versions misses some nice features such as USB support. For more info on the difference of Virtual Machines check this wikipedia article.
Only available in the full (closed source) version:
| |||||
feedback
|
|
I was using Virtual PC for a while to run Windows virtual machines. That works But then I wanted to setup a Ubuntu Virtual Machine and found that I couldn't with Virtual PC... Some people got it work but overall, it was a pain. I had all but given up but then I found Virtual Box. I could run Linux (any flavor) and on top of that, I could set the same thing up on my Mac. On top of this, I was able to run Windows Vista Ultimate in Virtual Box on my Mac OS X. These are the two main reasons that I tell everyone about Virtual Box. If still not convinced, see these other reasons:
| ||||
feedback
|
|
It's the easiest to install and configure of the ones I've used (VB, VMWare, VirtualPC). However they were all within a fraction of a point of degrees-of-difficulty. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
Now that VirtualBox 4 has been released, the entirety of VirtualBox is licensed under the GNU GPL. All the closed-source features in the older versions still exist, in the form of downloadable Extension Packs. These extension packs are licensed under the PUEL license. | |||
|
feedback
|
