Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Recently having to set my PATH environment variable installing the JDK, I found it quite annoying that the box where you set environment variables was not re-sizable, and had was generally quite horrible to edit.

Aside from MS just not making this more UI-friendly, I was wondering if this was built as such for a reason, or if we are hanging onto some legacy code that is affecting this.

Any ideas?

share|improve this question

migrated from Feb 19 '10 at 4:04

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

Alternatives to the standard dialog are discussed in Is there a good tool for managing the Windows Environment Variables?. – Piotr Dobrogost Oct 15 '11 at 18:48

I'm going to blow your mind here, but as of Windows 10 build 10565, this window is finally resizeable.

enter image description here

share|improve this answer
I'm on Windows 10/64 Pro and this isn't the case. – isherwood Dec 9 '15 at 22:15

Maybe you'd like this nifty tool I've been using for a while, ResizeEnable. It allows you to resize windows that are normally not resizable:

alt text

share|improve this answer

I don't get it at all. It's completely unnecessarily painful.

Use Windows Path Editor instead. It'll make life a lot easier and less error prone (I realise this doesn't answer your question per se, but is offered as general advice!)

share|improve this answer
Only edits your path not Environment variables. Try RapidEE for editing environment variables. – Ev0oD Sep 2 '15 at 11:27

Anything that is considered a dialog by Windows isn't resizable. And that includes, unfortunatelly, the aforementioned as well.

share|improve this answer

While it indeed may have been built to make power user heads expode everywhere, I find the setx command to be a frequently viable way around it, e.g.:

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.