up vote 4 down vote favorite
share [g+] share [fb]

Whats the difference between commands:-

  1. ls
  2. \ls

So if i write 

$ls
or 
$\ls

Whats the difference?

link|improve this question
50% accept rate
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 7 down vote accepted

The backslash will force the ls command to be used without any aliasing.

link|improve this answer
+1 That would make sense – Draemon Feb 23 '10 at 15:23
pls tell a bit about aliasing. Whats aliasing actually? – shadyabhi Feb 23 '10 at 15:26
An explanation of aliasing may warrant a new question, but here are some useful aliases superuser.com/questions/7083/useful-command-line-aliases and the Wikipedia explanation en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alias_%28command%29 – heavyd Feb 23 '10 at 15:40
@Shadyabhi An alias is a short string that has been defined as a convenient short-cut for a longer command. E.g., ls may normally be an alias for ls --color, which is generally more useful than ls's normal behaviour. The MAN page documents the alias command: ss64.com/bash/alias.html – sblair Feb 23 '10 at 15:41
thanx for pointing out that "ls --color" thing. I was just about that thing too.. Thanx.. nicely put. – shadyabhi Feb 23 '10 at 16:06
feedback
up vote 2 down vote

In general, backslash suppresses expansion, except, confusingly, where it does C-like escaping of control characters.

In the first part of your question, sblair is right, the backslash suppresses aliasing, or alias expansion..

In the second part, the backslash suppresses dollar-expansion: $ls expands to the current value of the ls shell variable, whilst $\ls is not expanded. So if ls is not set to anything, echo $ls; echo $\ls will print a blank line (the contents of $ls) followed by $ls on the next line.

link|improve this answer
thanx. short and precise. – shadyabhi Feb 23 '10 at 16:07
+1 Well spotted. – sblair Feb 24 '10 at 0:07
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.