Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

samba service on linux and.. copy folder? keep games as .rar at samba and extract them on the fly?

rsync daemon at the server?

ftp them from the server?

anyone has any benchmarks or previous experience.

share

migration rejected from stackoverflow.com Jul 10 at 5:15

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers. Votes, comments, and answers are locked due to the question being closed here, but it may be eligible for editing and reopening on the site where it originated.

closed as unclear what you're asking by Canadian Luke, Sathya Jul 10 at 5:15

Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1  
Might want to describe what it is you want to do, as opposed to asking about a transfer method to implement a solution of dubious value. –  romandas Jul 24 '09 at 0:33

3 Answers 3

Samba is probably the best option. If you have the ISO's you can just mount on the fly and install the game. I brought my linux box to a lan once and had 4 people mount an ISO's from it and installed games no problem.

share

Samba can be quite slow when serving files as 'read-only' from a Linux system to Windows clients. By all means use Samba if you require write access from the Windows systems, but if you're primarily downloading the content, I'd go with something else, preferably:

  • FTP server, probably the fastest, and there's heaps of FTP clients out there. You get easy-to-implement write access too.
  • HTTP server, everyone has a browser, of course :).

I wouldn't use rsync because it often uses SSH by default, which adds overhead in terms of encrypting everything. On an internal LAN, I'd be less concerned about encryption, especially if you're setting up a read-only anonymous repository (a la via FTP).

share

If you have hardware that is capable of "gigabit ethernet" FTP is probably better choice. I have had problems using samba with windows, so i think using multiple systems with samba will give you a headache.

share
    
When would you use SAMBA without windows? That is what it was made for after all. –  MDMarra Aug 10 '09 at 4:46