What is the best lightweight window manager (optimized for running over a network) for Linux?
|
feedback
|
migrated from serverfault.com Jul 24 '09 at 12:21
This question came from our site for system administrators and desktop support professionals.
closed as not constructive by Gareth, Diago Sep 30 '11 at 7:00
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
Why do you wan't to run the windowmanager/desktop over the network? Is it not enough to run the application you are interested in with something like ssh and x-forwarding? Beside that, how about xfce? | |||||
feedback
|
|
Fluxbox is a pretty good window manager if you want something very lightweight. However, as Johan said, you should consider using ssh with x forwarding before you decide you need a graphical desktop. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Openbox, but over a network I would use NX from nomachine | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
How about Enlightenment - it's lightweight, and still has a bit of eye candy ;)
You can install it on Debian/Ubuntu by using If you're running over a network, I would just use the "failsafe xterm" mode of your desktop manager. | ||||
feedback
|
|
WindowMaker, giving all its sense to "lightweight". (The only window manager which makes me think the system hanged because it loads in 1 second...) | ||||
feedback
|
|
I've used dwm. It's very, very small and lightweight, but it's a dynamically tiling wm, so it takes a lot of getting used to. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
If you want to run as an X terminal, there are many variants of FVWM that are fairly light on bandwidth. If you want to run on a low spec PC, 'lightweight' window managers are two a penny. I've used IceWM on Vector Linux at one point and found it to be quite usable on a late model Pentium III. You could probably use it on lower spec machines down to maybe 64 or 128MB of RAM. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
I agree with the comments above re: using ssh with x forwarding. However, regarding a light weight WM, I personally prefer tiling WMs such as awesome, dwm, xmonad, etc. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
You should use any Window Manager you want at the remote host. Maybe you want to take a look at TightVNC and FreeNX for remote control software that performs reasonably well over broadband connections. I recommend also enabling compression and X11 Forwarding through SSH if you decide to use only a lightweight window manager.
| ||||
|
feedback
|
|
For using GUI applications remotely, most of the time you don't need to run a window manager on the remote machine - just use X11 forwarding, to forward the specific application. By default it should be enabled when you
If you have an X-server running locally, simply execute the command, say You need to be running an X server locally for this, on Linux this isn't a problem. On Windows Xming is good. On OS X, | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Back around the days when I first ran Linux on a 486sx with 16MB (or it might have been 8MB) of RAM, and X paged when loading more than a very basic text editor or CD audio player, the window managers I used were OpenLook, FVWM, and IceWM. OpenLook in particular was both nice (in an unusual, unique, but elegant sort of way) and lightweight too. IceWM is a good lightweight option if you're looking for a windows-like feel. FVWM would be great if you want the classic Unix workstation look on a tiny netbook :) | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
I'll suggest Ratpoison: I became addicted to it after a couple of hours using it. If you are a GNU Screen user you'll feel like at home, and it is surely the lighter window manager I used so far (in the list there are gnome, kde, lxde, enlightenment, fluxbox, openbox, xfce, icewm, fvwm, twm, and maybe others that I cannot remember). | ||||
|
feedback
|

