Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Chrome just shows text on properly formed RSS pages. Browse over to

http://www.care2.com/greenliving/food-recipes/feed

for example. Firefox and Explorer show the same page in a human friendly format.

share|improve this question

migrated from stackoverflow.com Jul 25 '09 at 23:25

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

1  
I discovered doing QA on my site's RSS feeds. There are versions of RSS feeds out there that do render properly in Chrome-- the NY Times feeds for example. I haven't investigated reason for the difference, hoping someone would know... –  DC Coder Jul 24 '09 at 1:01
    
right click -> view source, until they fix it. –  hyperslug Jul 26 '09 at 2:09
add comment

4 Answers 4

RSS feeds are planned for chromium/chrome. There is a bug in the chromium bug tracker for this. It looks like this isn't anything that they are in a real hurry on (the bug has been open for over a year). Of course, the alternative is to write it yourself and submit a patch. If it can get past codereview, you can get most anything in to the main repository.

EDIT: Looks like that bug has now been closed and the official answer is to use this extension.

share|improve this answer
    
"356 people starred this issue..." 357 now. –  hyperslug Jul 26 '09 at 7:20
add comment

There are some bookmarklets over at http://feeds.ramisp.org/.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Displaying XML in Chrome Browser

The author of the above post created a Google Chrome extension (for the dev channel version only right now) that will render XML (e.g., RSS) into a tree like view, ala Firefox and IE.

alt text

share|improve this answer
add comment

It's probably by design. It just means support for the RSS format was not designed into Chrome.

share|improve this answer
    
RSS is not a protocol. –  whitequark Aug 19 '10 at 14:02
    
@whitequerk: you're right, it's not a protocol, it's a format but for all intents and purposes the answer was correct in essence. –  Miky Dinescu May 25 '11 at 20:32
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.