If so which version please?
Toshiba Satellite L500D 4GB ddr2 and a Realtek RTL8181SU wifi usb 2.0 card
i'm just double checking beacuse
http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/toshiba.html says i cannot
|
If so which version please? Toshiba Satellite L500D 4GB ddr2 and a Realtek RTL8181SU wifi usb 2.0 card i'm just double checking beacuse http://www.linux-on-laptops.com/toshiba.html says i cannot | |||
feedback
|
|
It's very easy to tell by booting off of a "live" Linux CD. If you get booted up OK, just check that everything you expect to work, works. If all is OK, then you can install Linux permanently. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
Huh... everythig should run fine on that computer. Even Vista! | |||||
feedback
|
|
Clearly, a live CD is by far the best way to test the compatibility of a computer. Toshiba ones are known to be very good for Linux Compatibility. When I was shopping for my own computer, I went with a Ubuntu CD right in the store. And I was looking for Intel chipset to ease the wireless connection. This was the best way to ENSURE Linux would run on my laptop. I ended up buying a Toshiba because it passed all tests, and it was a brand name I knew would be reliable. One store did not let me test their laptops with my Linux CD. I simply told them 'Hasta la Vista", no pun intended. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
It almost certainly will run and run well. In general. You might have problems with something specific (perhaps the kernel doesn't have a good driver for you network card, or the drivers for the graphics card are a little slow in 3D operation). As Marnix said, try some live CDs like Ubuntu, Knopix, Slax, and so on. If the current stable versions have trouble, try newer ones (the current betas of Ubuntu 10.04, for instance, are likely to support some newer hardware that the last LTC release (08.04) does not). The same for if you have had problems in the past. On one motherboard I have very little of around the time of Ubuntu 08.10 would but from LiveCD/InstallCD (I cant remember which others I tried but it was a few, though Debian/Stable of that era installed and ran fine and Puppy booted off the LiveCD too), but 9.10 and the new 10.04 are fine. Presumably there was something odd on that board (or the way it was configured) that a particular range of kernel/tool-chain variants/versions didn't like but later ones resolved what-ever the problem was. If you find one works well, then other distros/versions of around the same initial release date are likely too as well (as they will have similar Kernel and library versions and so forth), so you will have several to chose from. | ||||
|
feedback
|