Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am looking at Virtual-Desktop Managers for Windows 7. Right now it seems that VirtualWin is supposed to be about the best one available for use on Windows. I have never used anything like this though and I am just curious from others experience and knowledge, does something like this hog up a lot of system resources?

I do not NEED it but it is a nice feature to have when I do want to use it, my PC's performance is more important then using it. So is virtual esktop managers a resource hog or probably not?

Please share any tips/advice/ or comments on them, thank you =)

share|improve this question
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

What most of these do is simply keep track of a list of windows on each "desktop", and simply hide the ones that shouldn't be there using the standard windows API. This means that in general, they shouldn't slow down your PC, or use any significant amount of resources. Some fancier features like desktop-previews, or per-desktop wallpapers, however, may have a small performance hit.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks, I think I will give it a try, it seems it could be useful in a programmers/developers workspace –  jasondavis May 1 '10 at 0:26
    
@jasondavis: It is, but IMO nowhere near as much as extra physical monitors. –  Phoshi May 1 '10 at 0:58
    
it is not just "desktop" and "hiding if the window is not on the current one", that desktop-api is really part of the os. the logon-screen is "a desktop", the screensaver is on its own desktop. what i find really interesting is why microsoft does not built their own desktopmanager into the ui of the os. so, as phoshi said, there is no real negative effect of using such desktop apps as the desktop api is built right into the os. –  akira May 1 '10 at 1:45
    
@akira: Well, I was oversimplifying, but indeed. Back in XP we had the virtual desktops powertoy, which was actually decent, and I believe they did something for Vista, but it'd be nice to have something built in. –  Phoshi May 1 '10 at 9:22
add comment

Most VDMs work by hiding and showing windows on the existing desktop. Sysinternals' Desktops actually creates extra desktops, which do indeed consume system resources, not to mention that each gets its own running instance of Windows Explorer (for the task bar and start menu).

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.