Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am using ffmpeg to cut out a section of a large file like this:

ffmpeg -i input.wmv -ss 60 -t 60 -acodec copy -vcodec copy output.wmv

The -ss part works fine but the -t is ignored. It correctly removes the initial specified seconds specified with -ss but then keeps going to the end of the input with the copy.

Is there a way to use ffmpeg to cut off the end of a video without recoding it?

share|improve this question

4 Answers 4

You can use the -ss option to specify a start timestamp, and the -t option to specify the encoding duration. The timestamps need to be in HH:MM:SS.xxx format or in seconds.

The following would clip the first 30 seconds, and then clip everything that is 10 seconds after that:

ffmpeg -i input.wmv -ss 00:00:30.0 -c copy -t 00:00:10.0 output.wmv
ffmpeg -i input.wmv -ss 30 -c copy -t 10 output.wmv

Note that -t is an output option and always needs to be specified after -i.

Some tips:

  • If you use -ss after -i, you get more accurate seeking at the expense of a slower execution altogether. You can also put -ss before -i. See also: Seeking with FFmpeg – FFmpeg

  • You can use -to instead of -t to specify the timestamp to which you want to cut. So, instead of -i <input> -ss 30 -t 10 you could also do -i <input> -ss 30 -to 40 to achieve the same thing.

  • If your ffmpeg does not support -c, or -to, it is likely very outdated. Compile a new version yourself or download a static build from their homepage. It's really not complicated.

share|improve this answer
    
@Mondain Actually, you get more accuracy putting the -ss after. And slhck mentions this here blog.superuser.com/2012/02/24/… also in ffmpeg documentation for -ss it mentions a difference between putting it before or after. –  barlop Oct 11 '13 at 0:38

As other people mentioned, putting -ss before (much faster) or after (more accurate) the -i makes a big difference. The section "Fast And Accurate Seeking" on the ffmpeg seek page tells you how to get both, and I have used it, and it makes a big difference. Basically you put -ss before AND after the -i, just make sure to leave enough time before where you want to start cutting to have another key frame. Example: If you want to make a 1-minute clip, from 9min0sec to 10min 0sec in Video.mp4, you could do it both quickly and accurately using: ffmpeg -ss 00:08:00 -i Video.mp4 -ss 00:01:00 -t 00:01:00 -c copy VideoClip.mp4

The first -ss seeks fast to (approximately) 8min0sec, and then the second -ss seeks accurately to 9min0sec, and the -t 00:01:00 takes out a 1min0sec clip.

Also note this important point from that page: "If you use -ss with -c:v copy, the resulting bitstream might end up being choppy, not playable, or out of sync with the audio stream, since ffmpeg is forced to only use/split on i-frames."

This means you need to re-encode the video, even if you want to just copy it, or risk it being choppy and out of sync. You could try just -c copy first, but if the video sucks you'll need to re-do it.

share|improve this answer

I found that -ss combined with -c copy resulted in a half-second chop at the start. To avoid that, you have to remove the -c copy (which admittedly does a transcode)

share|improve this answer

For me -t option didn't work, but -vframes worked. I prefer using #frames, since I would rather cut at I-Frames and I found out GOP for video using ffprobe.

The command line that worked for me is:

ffmpeg -ss 60s -i input.wmv -vframes 1800 -acodec copy -vcodec copy output.wmv

By the way, putting -ss in the front of -i makes a big difference in execution time.

share|improve this answer
    
Actually -vframes (or -frames:v) should come after -i because it's an output option. –  slhck Nov 20 '13 at 12:55

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.