Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

what's better ? one 60 gb SSD (solid state drive) or two 30gb SSDs ?

should i get one for the operating system and another for some apps/games ? or should i just get one bigger and put everything on it ?

share|improve this question
7  
if you're buyin', i'll take 2 please! –  quack quixote May 12 '10 at 15:47
    
Count me in. :P –  Shiki May 12 '10 at 16:00
1  
possible duplicate: superuser.com/questions/64129/one-large-or-two-smaller-ssds –  sblair May 13 '10 at 17:14
    
Two is better than one. –  surfasb Dec 5 '11 at 7:13
add comment

5 Answers

RAID 0 won't get along with TRIM

share|improve this answer
2  
How does this answer the question? This should be a comment. –  Troggy May 12 '10 at 19:10
2  
@Troggy: It should be, but Cyrcle probably doesn't know that because they have less than 50 rep and therefore can't comment. –  Chris W. Rea May 12 '10 at 19:24
    
@Chris: Good point, but this could really use some link to reputable testing or report to back up this statement. Even as a comment, it still needs some more information. –  Troggy May 12 '10 at 19:35
5  
@Troggy: here's a link: serverfault.com/questions/38092/… –  davr May 12 '10 at 21:51
1  
@davr And also note that the newest answer to that question correctly points out that some Intel storage controllers will pass TRIM to (non-RAID) SSDs, even if the controller is in RAID-mode. –  sblair May 13 '10 at 17:10
show 1 more comment

If you get two, you can put them into Raid0. 0 means the amount of data that you will be able to recover after a failure. :P Or a raid1 which provides a good security against data loss. OR you can use one as a system drive and one for other stuff.. I don't really see a point in that. (However, if you tend to use Windows 7 (you should use that since its optimised for SSD), it'll eat your 30gb with a single bite. You should take the 60gb or two 30gb with RAID0 :))

share|improve this answer
    
I have yet to find someone having enough money to spend to actually put it in 2 SSDs in RAID0. –  Gnoupi May 12 '10 at 16:09
1  
Find a rich girl. Problem solved. ;P (Nah I didnt find one, so I'm still searching for one.. >.>) –  Shiki May 12 '10 at 16:17
    
How about 24 in a RAID... youtube.com/watch?v=96dWOEa4Djs –  Rich Bradshaw May 12 '10 at 18:46
    
Yeah loved that vid. Though I would be happy even with only the Intel Skulltrail mainboard. :) –  Shiki May 12 '10 at 20:25
add comment

Have a look at http://www.anandtech.com/show/3618/intel-x25v-in-raid0-faster-than-x25m-g2-for-250 - they tested this scenario.

I have 2 laptops with SSDs, one of them also has a spinning drive for all my junk. I'd go for 1 big drive in a laptop, please yourself in a desktop if you have space. That decision could depend more on cost and availability than on performance differences which may, or may not be noticeable.

2x SSDs won't be twice as fast as one and it won't be twice the difference from spinning rust. The 1st SSD is the order-of-magnitude difference, the 2nd is hte icing on the cake.

share|improve this answer
    
Update: I have 2 SSDs on my desktop now. One is for the OS & the other is for VMs. This combo works very well. –  CAD bloke Feb 16 '11 at 19:33
add comment

The point I would see is that you can have your OS/software on one device and data files, on the other device, both devices potentially transmitting/receiving AT THE SAME TIME. As those are slower ones than RAM, if everything is going through the same channel (CODE and DATA), you may experience delays that you could avoid if the bits were traveling on TWO different chips at the same time.

I guess this also depends on the amount of disk access you plan to have if you run Window$, chances are that you will have lots of accesses to OS/software. Also, this means that you can keep your data on a separate device that you can take to other computers, without requiring that you move your OS too.

JF

share|improve this answer
add comment

if your are looking for performance gains by having your OS on a SSD, I would recommend that. However if you are going to be using windows rather than linux, you may run into an issue about drive size once you start installing programs after installing the OS. What I would do is buy a SSD for the OS drive and the other would be a regular HDD as large as possible for just plain storage - have the OS boot of the SSD for quicker booting times and the large storage space on the other drive.

share|improve this answer
    
Or the other way round. I'm booting maybe twice a week, so it's more important for me to get my data fast. YMMV. –  maaartinus Feb 15 '11 at 5:50
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.