Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

My final goal is refactoring code written by my coworkers. So, is there a tool which can find files differing in only few words?

(Edit: this is for a Mac, but others might like non-Mac answers too.)

share|improve this question
    
@harry, given the revision history, I guess you posted a Windows answer, which was downvoted because only then the Mac requirement emerged? I'd rather have the Mac requirement dropped and see your answer (if it was a good non-Mac answer) as well! –  Arjan Sep 18 '10 at 13:00
    
@Arjan : Done . –  harrymc Sep 18 '10 at 13:48
    
For a Mac, I wondered if Spotlight could be used. I doubt it, but if you know of a way to do things in Spotlight, then the mdfind command might help to write some script to automate things. However, I think it will always only use meta data. Hence finding similar files might limit on file type, but not on file contents. No cigar. –  Arjan Sep 18 '10 at 15:21

2 Answers 2

Simian does this for the source code of some languages. It is best at finding blatant copy-n-paste coding. Its developments seems to have stalled, but it works good enough.

share|improve this answer
    
Did not help very much — in rails app with a lot of very similar partials it only said, that I have similar lines in development.log –  tig Jun 21 '10 at 11:49
    
Did you give it the right files to analyze? You probably care about your sources, not development.log. For rails have a look at flay rubyforge.org/frs/… –  Benjamin Bannier Jun 21 '10 at 13:16
    
Yes I gave it all files in rails app dir –  tig Jun 22 '10 at 0:50

(For Windows)

The product Anti-Twin (free for private use) claims to be able to do this:

If you want Anti-Twin not only to search for full duplicates but also to similar files, you can reduce the desired minimum match from the default value of 100% to up to 60%. This function has been particularly designed for the search of almost identical files where only a tiny detail was changed. Anti-Twin uses the similarity search as soon as you enter a value below 100%. The similarity comparison takes much longer than the 100% full duplicate search!

Unfortunately, the similarity search as part of the byte-by-byte comparison only makes sense for a few file types, because a similarity can only be detected if the files are uncompressed and unencrypted. Uncompressed files are e.g. unformatted texts (.TXT) and HTML.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm on mac and running something through wine, parallels or something like that will not make refactoring easier, only harder :) –  tig Jun 21 '10 at 11:50
    
@tig: You should have specified this in your post. I've added the mac tag. –  harrymc Jun 21 '10 at 12:12
    
@Arjan: I undeleted this answer, as you requested. –  harrymc Sep 18 '10 at 13:47
    
rightfully so! Removed the [mac] tag again. Should have been [osx] anyway ;-) –  Arjan Sep 18 '10 at 14:01

protected by slhck Mar 18 '13 at 6:21

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.