Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

How can I pipe the output of a shell command into a new buffer in Vim? The following obviously wouldn't work, but you can see what I'm getting at:

:!echo % | :newtab
share|improve this question

You can't pipe the output of a shell command into a command that creates a new buffer, but you can create a new buffer and read the output of a shell command into that buffer with one entry on Vim's command line. A working version of your example would be

:tabnew | r !echo <c-r>=bufname("#")<cr>

Note that the pipe symbol in this case is a separator between Vim ex commands, not the shell's pipe. See also

:help :tabnew
:help :r!
:help :bar
share|improve this answer
That's almost exactly what I need, just the other way around so that I can access the filename of the current buffer. Note: updated the question to hopefully clarify the desired end result. – Richard Marquez Jun 29 '10 at 6:44
@Richard Marquez: i updated this answer. the new tab is now opened with the "old" filename, thus you could call :!echo % – akira Jun 29 '10 at 8:24
But not :r!echo without altering the buffer. – Luc Hermitte Jun 29 '10 at 9:27
@Luc Hermitte: right, i ll rollback. – akira Jun 29 '10 at 11:04
@garyjohn, akira: thanks for the help. The "<c-r>=..." part made Vim spew errors, but I was able to get it working with ":tabnew | r !echo #". – Richard Marquez Jun 29 '10 at 14:22
:tabnew | enew | r ! <your shell cmd>

works for me.

share|improve this answer

Here's what I do. It's alluded to in comments in the above answers.

:new | r ! <cmd>
:new | r ! <cmd> #   (# is replaced with filename)

Example 1: Find all text files in /tmp

:new | r ! find /tmp -name '*.txt'

Example 2: You're editing file foo.txt and you want to run ls -la foo.txt and get the output in a buffer:

:new | r ! ls -la #

The # is replaced with the filename of the original buffer you're editing. This is particularly useful for ad-hoc source control commands e.g.

:new | r ! hg annotate -un #

:new creates a horizontal split, use :vnew if you want a vertical split instead and :tabnew for a new tab.

share|improve this answer

If you really require to store the result in a new buffer, but require info from the old current buffer, then you can either use system():

:let res = system('echo '.expand('%'))

or store the current buffer name for later:

:let bn = expand('%')
:tabnew | :r!echo <c-r>=bn<cr>
share|improve this answer
see the other answer, you can do it without storing the name in a variable. but good answer anyway. – akira Jun 29 '10 at 11:12
Indeed. I wasn't sure '#' will give the expected result in that case -- as I never use tabs – Luc Hermitte Jun 29 '10 at 12:42

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .