Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it just historic name or it has some real ground?

Should I use the term "request for comments, RFC" when putting some document just to receive comments, not to establish a standard?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by BloodPhilia, Bobby, Sathya, Ivo Flipse Jul 2 '10 at 14:59

Questions on Super User are expected to relate to computer software or computer hardware within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

As well as being off topic, it's probably also subjective and argumentative. Voted to close. – BloodPhilia Jul 2 '10 at 11:14
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The request for Comments system is a vehicle adopted by the Internet Engineering Task Force as a means for publishing material for peer review, or possibly just the conveyance of new ideas, which through iteration may, or may not, become standards.

Whilst the RFC system is typically the province of the IETF and to a lesser extent, other computer network engineers, other professions also have similar processes, whereby, someone may publish a document, which is then subject to peer review, etc. This is particularly true in the scientific community.

share|improve this answer
So I should not use the term "request for comment" when it is related neither to IETF nor to some other standard, right? – Vi. Jul 2 '10 at 11:30
If the document you create is for an internal process, I guess you could call it whatever you like. If, however, it's to be a public document, I think you would need to consider it's content and its audience. You may find that within specific disciplines, there are more appropriate formats. – Pulse Jul 2 '10 at 13:48

It is historic. Those documents used to be just recommendations between peers. Someone would have one problem and he would write RFC to find out whether his solution was ok. At some stage those documents just got to be official reference for quite few things but name was kept same.

Do notice that, while they are much more serious than in early days, not all RFCs are to be considered as standard. Quite few of them are just some idea or even joke.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .