Cloud Computing is said to be part of Green Computing. How are they related ?
feedback
|
closed as off topic by heavyd, Mehper C. Palavuzlar, ChrisF, Ivo Flipse♦ Jul 7 '10 at 6:32
Questions on Super User are expected to generally relate to computer software or computer hardware, within the scope defined in the faq.
|
They're both buzzwords whose actual meaning is in dispute? Very subjective question. I guess one decent answer would be that it's "greener" to have a big cluster doing computing for a hundred different companies than it is for those same companies to have their own setups. Less physical hardware, more efficient heating and cooling, etc, etc. Really it's just marketing though. Many "green" products are no better that their "non-green" counterparts: the only purpose of the label is to fool people who don't want to look at actual power consumption/heat production numbers. And don't get me going on "the cloud": an icon of a cloud is how "the rest of the internet" is represented on a traditional network diagram. This is because "the rest of the internet" is a complex subject, resistant to easy description. If you put "Here there be dragons" inside the cloud icon, it'd be perfect. A true terra incognita, an unknown land. So this rush to magical cloud land, instead of various specific hosting or service providers is extremely irritating to me. The cloud can mean anything that's not local, and things that can mean anything really mean nothing. In the context of this discussion, any idiot could be hosting your app on their "cloud", and they could be hosting it in the most wildly inefficient anti-green manner possible. | |||||||
feedback
|