Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am about to embark on my first ever Linux installation. I have read pages upon pages of installation instructions. but the only burning question I have that I cannot yet find an existing answer to is can I/should I install Linux Mint 9 on a separate hard drive than my Windows 7 installation? I do not require to know how to do it, I just want to know if I should do it.

I am aware of the benefits of having my OS on one drive and my data/installations on another. I did happen to read something that said there could be problems dual booting if the OSes are on separate physical drives.

Nothing tricky here; no RAID setup, just want to know if I can or should install Mint 9 on a separate physical drive.

Your input is greatly appreciated.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

I've had Windows and Linux (Gentoo) installed on separate hard drives, and there was no problem, as long as Windows is on the primary hard drive. Or at least, the Windows installer will refuse to install onto any drive other than the primary one (or on to any partition other than the first), although I think you might be able to swap the drives after installation and thereby get Windows on the secondary drive. But I digress.

Anyway, the point is, it certainly should be possible to install the two OS's on separate drives, but it's not necessary. You can, if you like, divide one drive into partitions and install Windows on one partition and Linux on another. (That's what I do) Some distributions' installers will handle this for you, I'm not sure if Mint is one of them. If you do this, you can use your second drive for data only. You'd probably want to format it as NTFS because that's reliably readable/writable from both Linux and Windows.

As far as whether it's a good idea: to get the fastest disk access times (and to prolong the longevity of the drives), it's probably best to split the workload between the two drives. Since you're dual-booting, you'll only be using the system files of one OS at a time, so it makes sense to put both operating systems on the same drive and a data partition on the other. That way, no matter which OS you're running, you'll be making use of both drives. The alternative, putting Windows (along with a smaller data partition) on one drive, and Linux (along with another data partition) on the other drive, is likely to stress out one drive more than the other, depending on which OS you boot into - unless you're careful about how you distribute your data files between the two drives (but who wants to do that?).

share|improve this answer
    
I'm sold. Thank you so much for your intelligent advice. –  Honus Wagner Jul 9 '10 at 20:07
    
the installation went perfectly and I am very happy with the logistics. Thanks again. –  Honus Wagner Jul 12 '10 at 12:13
    
Good to know! Glad I could help. –  David Z Jul 12 '10 at 20:05
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.