Are there reasons USB flash drives couldn't replace DVDs (and related disk technologies) in the coming years for storage of data, media and software? The main advantage I see to DVDs is that they are cheaper. Are there others?
feedback
|
|
Optical media have the benefit of being electrically isolated from the computer. As a result, they are more immune to damage from electrical problems (bad power supply, lightning, etc). Also, write-once is technologically easier in optical than in flash. (though PROMs were around before EEPROMs. Maybe I'm wrong here.) Are these reasons for DVDs to maintain their superiority? Probably not. Cost is really the dealbreaker. Always has been, always will be. | |||||||||
feedback
|
|
From a utility standpoint, not all motherboards in production today support booting from USB devices. I guess you'd call them legacy boards, but still true. I can see USB flash drives phasing out optical media as the boot medium of choice eventually, but who knows how long that will take. Look how long it took to phase out the floppy disk. | |||
|
feedback
|
|
DVD drives have built in encryption which software vendors are forced to comply with in order to access the video on the drive. USB drives have no such protection. Video distributors are reluctant to switch to a DRM free physical format. | |||||||||||
feedback
|
|
Here's one think I believe was overlooked here: are we comparing flash drives of today with today's DVDs or are we comparing flash drives which were in use back when DVDs were new? Remember 10 years ago how small and expensive flash drives were? They couldn't be compared to a DVD. Same thing is happening right now, except we now have BDs and modern flash drives. A single layer BD-R is much more cheaper than a flash drive of comparable size. Same thing for double layer BD-R. | ||||
feedback
|
|
For write-once, DVD is cheaper and more reliable. Also, most DVD players won't read flash drives. That's all I can think of. | |||
feedback
|
