Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Iam writing my bachelor thesis at the moment. The problem for me is now the spellchecker (I use Open Office but this is a general problem) won't recognize .NET as a valid word. A also cannot add it to a user specific dictionary because of the leading dot. Also the grammar checker has a mayor problem with the dot.

I consider this a general problem with spell-checkers and grammar-checking software. If I recall correctly for a similar reason they invented a lowercase and a uppercase version of ß (German letter 'S-Z', Html entity: ß) but which are both looking the same.

To make it short, is there a unicode symbol which looks like a dot but is classified as a letter symbol?

share|improve this question

migrated from Jul 29 '10 at 23:53

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

Although your thesis is about programming, this particular question is better suited for – Greg Hewgill Jul 29 '10 at 11:34
I'd suggest using DotNet instead everywhere and then you could just do a global search and replace right before handing it in/printing it. Btw, I think this should probably be on superuser rather than stackoverflow. – ho1 Jul 29 '10 at 11:36
OOo doesn't complain .NET for me. – KennyTM Jul 29 '10 at 11:36
I definitely wouldn't want to start including bogus characters in my documents just to satisfy a spell-checker. Spell-checkers are merely diagnostic tools to spot accidental mistakes: you can and should ignore them when you know you are right. It's a pointless task to try to author documents with zero spell-checker/grammar-checker reports. – bobince Jul 29 '10 at 12:08
@bobince: The problem is that so many bogus-errors let you oversee same real spelling errors. If I develop a program which compiles with thousands of warnings then the usefulness of warnings are senseless. – cody Jul 29 '10 at 12:26

According to the punctuation chart, "U+2024 ONE DOT LEADER" might be the right symbol fr your use case.

If there is a workaround, maybe using widely acknowledged DOTNet or, might be another discussion.

share|improve this answer
"DOTNet" would work whereas "" will suffer from the same problem – cody Jan 23 '11 at 13:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .