Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In Word 2010, how can you create quick style sets that include multilevel lists (include being the operative word)? As background, I have created a set of styles for a long agreement form and assigned them to levels in a certain custom multilevel list. I then also saved those styles as a quick style set called Long Agreement. I have saved those styles in my normal template. That all works fine for assigning styles to a Long Agreement.

What I'd like to do next is create a second style set called Short Agreement. I will assign certain styles to that style set. The issue is that I don't see how to tie a different custom multilevel list to those Short Agreement styles. When I click on Change Styles, Short Agreement [style set], and I apply those styles, how can I get it to automatically use the multilevel list that I assign to short agreements?

share|improve this question

Style sets are nothing else the dotx Template files. So to have different style sets showing up in the Word user interface, you must create different templates. In your case, you'll have "Long agreement.dotx" and "Short agreement.dotx" in your Word QuickStyles folder, right?

To have different multilevel list bound to different style sets, you must open the appropriate template and define in a first step the multi-level list format in this template. You take care to bind the different level to the built-in heading styles 1-9. In a second step you format the heading styles in a way appropriate to the template, e.g. for the Short agreement you use smaller fonts and smaller paragraph spacing.

You'll end up with two distinct templates, which represent two style sets. Each template has heading styles bound to a list definition. As of my own tests, if you apply the style set to a document, the styles are copied together with their list definition - even when this list definition is not visible in the List Gallery. From a user's point of view, this seems to be an approach which is easier to understand. Users shouldn't care about the combination of List Formats and Styles, but should only apply the style set.

As of my tests, there's no efficient way to ship List Formats as such to computers or users in a corporate environment. The only way is to bind them to styles, and ship them with templates (or create them through code, as the "Numbering Tools" on the market do). In my eyes, this is also the better way to have users apply correctly multi-level lists, because multi-level lists are used in 99% of documents with the idea of structuring the content. So a lot of misunderstanding and direct formatting happens, if List Formats show up in the gallery without relation to heading styles.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .