Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

After almost 10 years, MediaWiki still has no support for a WYSIWYG editor. The metapage explaining various info about this topic states that

The problem is that any WYSIWYG editor would have to know wikitext grammar, and no full grammar for wikitext exists - the "parser" doesn't parse, it's a twisty series of regular expressions.

So - is it technically impossible, or no successfull effort has been made to specify the grammar?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by Nifle, heavyd, nhinkle, BloodPhilia, Sathya Sep 5 '10 at 0:29

Questions on Super User are expected to relate to computer software or computer hardware within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
Well, for one thing, it's near impossible to make one that would understand any markup language more than a human can. Another that when you think of it, better formatted source makes for better formatted results. Think of Daring Fireball vs. a typical Blogger blog. –  digitxp Sep 4 '10 at 20:47
1  
I don't understand what you're saying here. –  user45971 Sep 4 '10 at 20:51
3  
Ok, try playing around with Google Sites for a few minutes. If you start making a table and make a list in it, or something else equally complicated and long, it starts to slow down. If you see the HTML source, the source is as heck as spaghetti-y. This is all solved if you are forced to make everything good from the source. –  digitxp Sep 4 '10 at 21:22
add comment

1 Answer

Nothing (well, almost nothing) is technically impossible, it is more than likely that the majority of people who do the editing know the commands off by heart and simply do not need it, therefore, the cost/time of development does not outweigh the benefits of having it.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.