Tell me more ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Recently I stupidly deleted some photos I shouldn't have. I used a program to recover the photos, some of them came back in a corrupted condition like below with grey areas.

Any idea on how to fix this? The information is clearly there in some form, as when I view the photos with Windows Photo Viewer, the complete image is briefly shown for a fraction of a second while windows is generating the preview.

share|improve this question

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Some large images contain a smaller thumbnail which is a low-resolution version of the entire image.

This smaller image-inside-image is used by some programs, such as Windows Explorer when displaying the image in Icon View. Otherwise, to display the image's icon would require reading the entire image and converting it to icon-size, which would unacceptably slow down the display of the folder.

I'm guessing that Windows Photo Viewer is displaying this thumbnail in a user-friendly manner, while reading the larger image. However, that larger image is damaged, and only the thumbnail has survived as intact.

Recuva is a good photo-recovery program, so I guess that the damage is caused by your having over-written that part of the image. You should never write data to a volume that you wish to recover.

If, however, that volume is still reasonably intact, you can also try another very good file recovery product:
PC INSPECTOR File Recovery
but remember to copy the recovered images to some other volume, otherwise when recovering one image you may be destroying another.

For repairing damaged JPEG images see this thread : Corrupt jpegs, thumbnail extracted....
It recommends quite a few such tools, as well as thumbnail extraction tools.
ExifTool looks especially good.

share|improve this answer
Thanks harry, useful info. You know if there is anyway of getting at this smaller 'image-inside-image'? Would be nice to recover that if nothing else works. – Dan Sep 25 '10 at 18:10
Dan: See the addition at the end. – harrymc Sep 25 '10 at 19:56
Thanks mike very helpful. I used JpegSnoop in the end (also mentioned in your link), amazing what it brought back. Thanks for your time, managed to resort some precious photos, you have made me very happy. – Dan Sep 27 '10 at 11:04

There are a few reasons why you might not have fully recovered an image. The data may have been overwritten before you did the recovery, in which case it's well and truly gone. If the file was fragmented, some programs my not be able to piece it back together. You could try another program, but I would say that you should count yourself lucky of you got more than half of them back fully intact.

share|improve this answer
What about the fact the image is there in some form, as it is shown fully, briefly? – Dan Sep 25 '10 at 17:38
Iv marked you answer down as it is incorrect. I was able to recover the images with the advise given by harry – Dan Sep 26 '10 at 21:01

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.