Sign up ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm looking for a freeware personal wiki with these additional criteria:

  1. Use plaintext files for the wiki articles.
  2. Have desktop Windows version, and mobile version (Windows Mobile or Android).
  3. Can be used in portable mode on USB memory sticks.
  4. Use simple Wiki markup (better still legible text Markdown format).
  5. Provide autogenerated TOC of sections in wiki articles.
  6. Still under active development.

I currently use Dale Lane's bLADE Wiki, that meets all the criteria above except #6.

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by DavidPostill, Nifle, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Mokubai Jan 4 at 9:47

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking product, service, or learning material recommendations are off-topic because they become outdated quickly and attract opinion-based answers. Instead, describe your situation and the specific problem you're trying to solve. Share your research. Here are a few suggestions on how to properly ask this type of question." – DavidPostill, Nifle, Ƭᴇcʜιᴇ007, Mokubai
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

2 Answers 2

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Meeting some of the requirements is Ema Personal Wiki.

A disclaimer: it's my own app :)

share|improve this answer
Thanks Jan Willem B. I think your Ema Personal Wiki meets my requirements 1, 2, 3, 4, & 6; but not requirement 5. It's certainly in my list of personal wiki to consider if further development improves it, even though it's shareware. I'm still holding out for a freeware one. ;-) – sabre23t Oct 9 '10 at 12:16

I have been using VimWiki plugins for a while now. Now, if you are not familiar with Vim, perhaps try Tiddlywiki instead.

I use VimWiki this way:

  1. I install Vim on my USB drive, so I can edit on the fly.
  2. VimWiki manages wiki in plain text format but you can convert the entire wiki to HTML. Unfortunately, you might have to host your wiki to be viewable online via your phone.
  3. Markup is simple, but not markdown. For instance, h1 would be =Title= and h2 would be ==title==. *bold* and _emphasize_.
  4. Have some math support, you are going to have to visit their Google Code group for more info.
  5. Table of content? %toc at the beginning of article will insert table of content to the HTML file when converted.
  6. Can use HTML templates, so if you need to add headers, it's no problem.
  7. Oh another one that I love, table!! In plaintext, but it auto-aligns your table cells. The reason I started using this wiki.

And under development.

Of course the downside to this is vim. It's a steep learning curve so if you haven't used vim before, it might not be worth it to use this wiki.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.