I want to connect my external 2TB USB HDD that has 4 partitions, to be treated as a set of removable drives on Windows.

This is because I do not want Windows to create "System Volume Information" and "$Recycler" ans stuff on it ( these are not created for removable drives right? )

I just want Windows to use the drive as simple plain old storage without cluttering it up with its internal stuff and metedata - and as far as I know, removable drive is the way to go.

So I have these questions:

  1. Is marking the external USB HDD as removable drive what I am looking for?
  2. what's the difference between it being marked as external HDD vs removable drive
  3. how do I make this happen
  4. how do I detect what type it is, currently and after the change

  5. Also - I would like to format the drive with a filesystem that would be efficient as well as compatible with Linux and Windows. What would be such an efficient filesystem? extFAT? I don't think FAT32 would be good for a 2TB storage? ( there would be too much wastage? )

link|improve this question

50% accept rate
feedback

2 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

To avoid "System Volume Information" and "$Recycler", do the following for the external disk drive:

  1. Right-click the Recycle Bin, select Properties, click the disk, check "Do not move files to the Recycle Bin", then OK.
  2. Go to Control Panel -> System, click System protection, uncheck the disk, click OK.

If the above directories were already created, you might need after this to take ownership of them in order to delete.

The best common format is probably NTFS, as the majority of current Linux distributions supports the NTFS file system out of the box, and it doesn't suffer from the limitations of FAT32.

In case of performance problems on Linux, give a try to Paragon NTFS & HFS filesystem drivers for Linux.

link|improve this answer
EXCELLENT tips! Is the Paragon drivers liable to corrupt the FS ? Have you been using these personally for some time? – PoorLuzer Oct 9 '10 at 23:00
1  
Never tried them, but I heard good things about them. However, given that an external drive is slower to start with, no reason to use them unless performance is really unacceptable. – harrymc Oct 10 '10 at 6:28
feedback

@harrymc answered everything correctly (+1 to him) except this part:

I would like to format the drive with a filesystem that would be efficient as well as compatible with Linux and Windows. What would be such an efficient filesystem? extFAT? I don't think FAT32 would be good for a 2TB storage? ( there would be too much wastage? )

If you want to support Linux boxes, the only really good filesystem that works between the systems is FAT32. Linux can read and write to NTFS, but the Linux NTFS driver runs as a FUSE module, and performance is comparatively poor. exFAT would be the best option, because FAT32 doesn't allow filesizes greater than 4 GB, but AFAIK Linux and friends do not know how to read it (and neither do versions of Windows earlier than Windows 7)

link|improve this answer
I have also added the missing part, although I tend towards NTFS. – harrymc Oct 9 '10 at 18:12
1  
Billy, thanks for the answer. I do not trust the FAT32 too much - have lost a number of files when the USB Cable came off but the FS still registered that the files had been "written", only to be "found.xxx" on reboot. I like the journaling features of NTFS and would have liked something similar but compatible between OSes. – PoorLuzer Oct 9 '10 at 23:03
1  
@PoorLuzer: Generally I agree. I just wish there was a better performing driver for Linux. – Billy ONeal Oct 9 '10 at 23:33
Have you tried the Paragon drivers? – PoorLuzer Oct 9 '10 at 23:37
1  
There is a free Express version of Paragon (registration required). I haven't been able to find the difference between it and the paid version. – harrymc Oct 10 '10 at 6:30
show 3 more comments
feedback

Your Answer

 
or
required, but never shown

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.