Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have not used Vista, but heard that it contained DRM measures that can make legitimate computer use more difficult. For example, from this article:

Certain high-quality output paths--audio and video--are reserved for protected peripheral devices. Sometimes output quality is artificially degraded; sometimes output is prevented entirely. And Vista continuously spends CPU time monitoring itself, trying to figure out if you're doing something that it thinks you shouldn't. If it does, it limits functionality and in extreme cases restarts just the video subsystem.

Others said this was bunk, but some specific issues have been reported.

So: what about Windows 7? Is there anything you can't do with it specifically because of the DRM that's built-in?

share|improve this question
1  
You'll find some interesting information about and advocacy against DRM in Vista, and now Windows 7, at badvista.fsf.org ... I'm on the fence: I do like and use Vista and Windows 7, but I wish it didn't have technologies built-in that treat me like a thief! –  Chris W. Rea Aug 9 '09 at 12:49
    
I won't lie, I've erred on the wrong side of legal in Vista, but any supposed DRM in it has never appeared. –  Phoshi Sep 5 '09 at 13:44
add comment

2 Answers

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Nope!

Any DRM that there is in 7 has not affected me in one bit yet.

So many people said this about Vista, however I did not notice any problems. There was a huge bug in Vista with file copy speeds that people said was the DRM, however it was later fixed.

Using command prompt and doing copy was not affected so I don't think we will ever know if it was DRM or just bug.

Anyway, I was a happy Vista user and now I am a happy 7 user.

I know that there is DRM regarding HD disks and HDCP, however I do not use HD discs and unlike game/software DRM, I do not think that this is obtrusive - and it is as DRM should be, it just works without bugging the user.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I found this article on slashdot

I am not sure whether its been fixed

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.