Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I know the original VGA standard was meant to output 640x480 and that other standards over the original VGA connector are developed to output a higher resolution. (SVGA, XGA, etc.) But I was wondering if there's a specific limit to the resolution that the VGA connector can take.

Furthermore, are and if so how are for example DVI and HDMI limited on resolution?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 14 down vote accepted

See How Many Dots Has It Got for what is today still called VGA, but has evolved far beyond 640x480.

The resolution champion today seems to be WHUXGA (Wide Hex Ultra Extended Graphics Array) with resolution of 7680x4800 (36,864,000 total pixels).

Using VGA, the signal from the CPU is converted to VGA by the video adapter and sent to a monitor with VGA input. The conversion to VGA causes some loss of quality.

With DVI the signal is not converted (kept digital) and sent to the DVI input on the monitor.

DVI and HDMI are exactly the same as one another, image-quality-wise. The principal differences are that HDMI carries audio as well as video, and uses a different type of connector, but both use the same encoding scheme, and that's why a DVI source can be connected to an HDMI monitor, or vice versa, with a DVI/HDMI cable, with no intervening converter box.

source

share|improve this answer
2  
But is there technology/hardware limit? Could a standard with a higher resolution be developed for the VGA interface? And how about HDMI and DVI? –  BloodPhilia Oct 31 '10 at 16:16
    
I added some more info. –  harrymc Oct 31 '10 at 17:54
    
Thanks, but what about the maximum resolution/number of pixels that can be output? That was my initial question. –  BloodPhilia Nov 2 '10 at 8:38
1  
The current limit is 7680x4800, but it seems like it can be cranked-up at will. VGA-variants are apparently here to stay for many more years. Probably VGA is a solution for cheaper computers. –  harrymc Nov 2 '10 at 8:51
add comment

According to Wikipedia: The DVI support : (Single) WUXGA (1,920 × 1,200) @ 60 Hz (Dual) Limited by copper bandwidth limitations, DVI source limitations, and DVI sink limitations.

The HDMI 1.4a support only 4096×2160p24 over a single link.

The VGA can go up to 2048x1536px @85 Hz (388 MHz), and rarely 2560x1920 @63 Hz.

share|improve this answer
2  
Citation link? What does "rarely" mean in this context? –  Phrogz Mar 15 '13 at 3:10
    
@Phrogz: It seems there are no standards regarding the VGA cable maximum bandwidth. Please see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VGA_connector#Cable_quality That is the reason for the word "rarely". –  pabouk Sep 17 '13 at 16:40
add comment

DVI has an upper limit on bandwidth, which is resolution times refresh rate. You can get a higher resolution by lowering the refresh rate - some LCD monitors will let you run them at, say, 50Hz instead of 60Hz refresh, and while the screen is a little slower to update, they don't flicker like the old CRTs used to. Dual-link DVI has twice the bandwidth of ordinary DVI. I run 3840x2400 over dual-link DVI, but at only 24Hz refresh rate. I believe it is also possible to drive DVI outside its specified range, 'overclocking' it if you will, depending on your hardware. Short, good-quality cables help.

VGA being an analogue rather than digital connector tends to degrade gradually as bandwidth increases. Higher resolutions just aren't as crisp as DVI, even with high-quality cable and a good monitor. (This isn't so much the fault of the VGA cable as the electronics at either end. It may be that these days anyone who cares uses DVI, so even high-end monitors use cheap electronics for the analogue to digital conversion.) I have 1920x1080 over VGA but the display ends up a bit smudged compared to using DVI. Fiddling the sharpness setting on the monitor helps. There were CRTs which went up to 2048x1536 and used a VGA connector.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.