I have an IBM X31 with 1GB of RAM and a 1.4GHz proccessor running Windows 7 Home premium. Which would be more worthwhile to upgrade, the RAM to 2GB or the processor to a max of maybe 2GHz? Thanx in advance =)
feedback
|
closed as not constructive by Ivo Flipse♦ Mar 9 '11 at 22:06
This question is not a good fit to our Q&A format. We expect answers to generally involve facts, references, or specific expertise; this question will likely solicit opinion, debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. See the FAQ for guidance on how to improve it.
|
It depends on your usage. If you have several programs open simultaneously and find that the computer gets slowed down in that regard, upgrade your RAM. 1GB of memory can get filled up pretty quickly, and using swap a lot will really slow you down. If you're using any high-CPU programs like movie/music/photo editing then you'll see faster processing performance by upgrading your CPU. Basically, if you run many programs at once, upgrade your RAM. If you run one or only a few, upgrade the CPU. | |||||||
feedback
|
|
With only 1GB of RAM, you're going to be swapping in and out of memory mercilessly. In addition, memory is easier to upgrade (no worries about gluing heat sinks if you're doing it yourself) | |||
|
feedback
|
|
No matter what you're doing, that's very little RAM. Even with a faster CPU there's no where for what it's doing to go. It'd be a waste. | |||
|
feedback
|