Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm running a piece of software the requires a screen resolution of at least 1024 x 768. I was thinking about getting a netbook, but many of the netbooks I have looked at have a resolution of 1024 x 600. Why would they drop the below such a standard resolution?

share|improve this question
So they can claim "widescreen". – bgw Aug 11 '09 at 3:54
It's actually 1024x576... – RCIX Aug 19 '09 at 9:10
up vote 17 down vote accepted

Because Intel (until recently) restricted the size of the display that they would allow manufacturers to use with N-series Atom chips. This is the reason the Dell Mini 10, for example, uses a Z-series chip for the higher resolution version.

See here for an article that mentions this. I don't think Intel have publicly admitted this, and can't find a direct reference.

share|improve this answer
  1. It's an 8 or 10 inch display. 1024x768 usually means at least a 14 inch display.
  2. It's wide screen. Wide screen displays are relatively new. 1024 x 768 would look awful on a widescreen display. 1024x600 is standard for wide screens.
share|improve this answer

In order to make it fit in a small form factor and still get a resolution that is 1024 pixels wide (basically the new standard). And generally speaking people don't mind scrolling down, but hate scrolling sideways. So if the screen is shorter than usual, most people won't mind just scrolling down to display it, but making it wide enough to fit the most popular applications/websites is a must from a consumer-hapiness perspective.

share|improve this answer

Look down at your keyboard. Notice how it is wider than it is tall? That's a big part of it. The keyboard is largely the limiting factor in netbook design, everything else has to fit in that general shape.

share|improve this answer

Because of the size and the associated weight.

Of course, especially when it comes to netbooks, the price is a major factor, too.

share|improve this answer

I have a 10" 1366x768 netbook. The screen itself is ~150DP, and with Windows running at default DPI settings, small text is borderline too small to read if it's sitting on my knee. People with poor vision will have to hold it closer than normal or change the DPI setting in windows (at which point they might as well have bought a 1024x600 model anyway) resulting in a poorer user experience.

I like the higher resolution; but I'm not surprised that it has never been more than a tiny niche in the market. IIRC it's been several years since anyone has released a 10" model at that resolution. Although with Windows 8 requiring a minimum of 1024x768 to run and 1366x768 to run two metro apps side by size this might change in the future.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

protected by BinaryMisfit Nov 26 '10 at 14:37

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .