Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Finally I decided to move from HDD to SSD. I'm waiting for the third generation of Intel SSDs G3 to become available to purchase one.

In the meantime I'm reading articles, user reviews etc and I see that the general recommendation is to align partitions to match drive's erase block size right after I format the drive. This will supposedly increase the performance and lower drive wearing.

My question is: is it really required to align partitions on a modern (like Intel G3) SSD?

If there are no physical heads/sectors in the drive why can't SSD firmware handle the alignment issues itself? I know that Windows7 does SSD alignment automatically, but I'm on Gentoo and not interested in automatic stuff.

Thanks

share|improve this question
    
As SSD uses its own wearing algorithm, and since they're so stupidly fast in the Intel range, I wouldn't bother. That 15% - 20% performance increase is only relevant (in my opinion) on rotating storage. –  user3463 Nov 19 '10 at 16:42

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

It's not required, but it's still a good idea. The reason for this (to summarize a LOT, because I don't have a good link handy) is that reads and writes aren't the same size, so files overlapping block boundaries will require more operations than not, which hurts performance and decreases the lifetime of the drive.

Windows Vista/7 and I believe the newest Linux kernel already do this for you by default when they format a drive, so it's not really a concern so much anyway. (Not sure about OS X).

share|improve this answer
    
I'm not sure how can Linux kernel do alignment, but the rest seems to be true.I was hoping to hear from someone who knows SSD internal logic, but it seems to be unrealistic. –  Oleg Mikheev Nov 21 '10 at 15:14
    
@Oleg - How can you not be sure how it does alignment? I think perhaps you have the impression alignment is an active, constant process. This isn't the case - you do it once, when you create the partition. –  Shinrai Nov 23 '10 at 15:26

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.