Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've happily installed Linux on my MacBook Pro with 4 GB of RAM, but I only get 3.6 GB available:

robert@raptor ~$ free -m
             total       used       free     shared    buffers     cached
Mem:          3684       2184       1500          0         83       1096
-/+ buffers/cache:       1004       2680
Swap:         6149          0       6149

I'm running a 64-bit kernel so this should not be a problem:

robert@raptor ~$ uname -a
Linux raptor #1 SMP PREEMPT 2010-10-25 08:40:12 +0200 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

What can I do to get the whole 4GB available?

Update: this is what I get when running top on MacOS X:

PhysMem: 540M wired, 640M active, 231M inactive, 1411M used, 2685M free.

where used + free = 4096 MB.

Update 2: There's a thread on where a user complains of the same problem with Windows 7/64 bit.

Update 3: /proc/meminfo output:

MemTotal:        3773288 kB
MemFree:         1164244 kB
Buffers:          109096 kB
Cached:          1270520 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:          1446756 kB
Inactive:         962728 kB
Active(anon):     803404 kB
Inactive(anon):   230556 kB
Active(file):     643352 kB
Inactive(file):   732172 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
SwapTotal:       6297596 kB
SwapFree:        6297596 kB
Dirty:               792 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:       1029880 kB
Mapped:           185096 kB
Shmem:              4096 kB
Slab:             131260 kB
SReclaimable:     106212 kB
SUnreclaim:        25048 kB
KernelStack:        2680 kB
PageTables:        21248 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:     8184240 kB
Committed_AS:    3113016 kB
VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
VmallocUsed:      123884 kB
VmallocChunk:   34359596028 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
DirectMap4k:       54444 kB
DirectMap2M:     3852288 kB

Memory info from dmesg:

[    0.000000] Memory: 3759972k/5242880k available (4780k kernel code, 1336600k absent, 146308k reserved, 6603k data, 892k init)

Update 4:

Video card info according to lspci:

02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation G96 [GeForce 9600M GT] (rev a1)

Some dmesg output related to the model:

[    0.000000] DMI: Apple Inc. MacBookPro5,3/Mac-F22587C8, BIOS    MBP53.88Z.00AC.B03.0906151647 06/15/09
share|improve this question
what does cat /proc/meminfo give? some kernels need patches on some hardware, have to deal with this at work sometimes, but we have special patches. – madmaze Nov 29 '10 at 17:41
My first thought was video memory, but apparently that's not it. In the kernel logs (typically in /var/log/kern.log or thereabouts depending on your distribution), there should be a line containing Memory: 1234567k/1236789k available …: what does it say? (If there are other memory-related lines nearby, post them as well.) – Gilles Nov 30 '10 at 1:17
@madmaze, @Giles: please see my update to the question – Robert Munteanu Nov 30 '10 at 7:55
hmm odd, I wonder if it has to do with the 1000 vs 1024 thing and OSx just pretends that it actually has 4GB. That is just a guess though. – madmaze Nov 30 '10 at 17:06
@madmaze : I'd be suprised if that was the case. OS X is certified Unix after all. – Robert Munteanu Dec 17 '10 at 16:13

try adding the kernel-PAE and kernel-PAE-devel packages to your linux installation. Then in grub select the entry to boot the PAE kernel, and see if you're still only seeing 3.6GB.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the reply. I am currently using the -desktop kernel in OpenSUSE which contains PAE capabilities. But that is a non-issue since I am running the 64-bit variant : Linux raptor #1 SMP PREEMPT 2011-02-21 10:34:10 +0100 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux – Robert Munteanu Apr 26 '11 at 6:49

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.