Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm thinking about building a new machine. It would be used for video processing, development, etc. Not gaming. 4 cores seems like a reasonable solution for this. The question is whether to go with the AMD Phenom II or the Intel Core 2 Quad. The Core i7 is pricier than I want to go right now due mainly to the motherboard costs. The AMD and Intel chips seem to be similarly priced and benchmark similarly. Is there a compelling reason to go with one over the other?

share|improve this question

closed as off-topic by nc4pk, Twisty, fixer1234, mdpc, DavidPostill Jul 22 '15 at 10:34

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "Questions seeking for hardware shopping recommendations are off-topic because they are often relevant only to the question author at the time the question was asked and tend to become obsolete quickly. Instead of asking what to buy, try asking how to find out what suits your needs." – nc4pk, Twisty, fixer1234, mdpc, DavidPostill
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

up vote 3 down vote accepted

I would take a look at all the linked articles here. That's quite a recent review of some of the higher end chips.

share|improve this answer

You might also consider the hidden cost of power usage:

  • at load (if you plan to do folding or something else that loads the cores 100%)

  • at idle (if it's a typical desktop / server, it is idle the vast majority of the time)

share|improve this answer
+1. [List of CPU power dissipation] – Alex Bolotov Aug 13 '09 at 10:27

I'm what you might call an Intel fanboy nowadays.

The Intel chips perform a bit better and the prices are low enough now that there's not much difference compared to AMD.

The main reason however that I prefer Intel is that I've been bitten by bad chipsets in the past when using AMD cpus.

share|improve this answer
Same here. I keep giving AMD a try because I want them to work out, and I keep having stability issues that seem to go back to mobo/chipset (not to mention overheating), so I keep ending up back with Intel. That said, my AMD powered Sun workstation is awesome! Apparently it's just not reasonable to build your own AMD system though. – Brian Knoblauch Aug 13 '09 at 12:21
Overheating is a weak arguement... I build last week a Phenom II 940 system and he never go over 40 degrees on load and 30 on idle.. That said I didn't put 1 millions fans in it, just take and Antec three hundred case with stock fan and it's sufficient. – Marc-Andre R. Sep 3 '09 at 14:41
AMD makes their own mainstream chipsets now and they're pretty solid. :-) – hanleyp Sep 9 '09 at 2:26

If you want to make from it hackintosh or use Intel compiler buy Intel otherwise buy Phenom II (because it's cheaper a bit).

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .