Mainly concerned if they are faster
IS THIS faster: 640GB SATA II 3Gb/s 7200 RPM Hard Drive (8MB Cache Buffer)
Or this: 80GB Intel® X25-M SATA Solid-State Drive
|
Mainly concerned if they are faster IS THIS faster: 640GB SATA II 3Gb/s 7200 RPM Hard Drive (8MB Cache Buffer) Or this: 80GB Intel® X25-M SATA Solid-State Drive | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
SSDs are based on flash memory technology. There are no moving parts, so the risk of drive failure is much lower. They're also literally HUNDREDS OF TIMES faster (in benchmarking - in practice you'll have other bottlenecks on the machine.) Compare a 10,000 RPM traditional drive versus the X25-M (which isn't even the fastest SSD around, although it's probably the most reliable). | |||||||||||||||||
feedback
|
|
Your title is confusing: you aren't comparing SSD to SATA. SATA is how the harddrive connects to the computer. Both harddrives you mention in the OP use SATA. SSD is the medium that the data are saved onto. The other is a mechanical drive, that contains spinning magnetic disks. | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
Of course the 80GB Intel X-25M would be faster, in both access speed and throughput. SSD nowadays offer much better performance than typical harddisks, especially when you are talking about drives that are slow in rotation speed (5400 rpm) and with a mere 8MB of cache. | |||
|
feedback
|