Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I see that some of the files in my directories under Linux have a . at the end of the permissions listing. What does the dot mean at the end of -rw-r--r--? How do you set it with chmod?

share|improve this question

migrated from Jan 8 '11 at 10:43

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

According to ls.c (line 3785), . means an SELinux ACL. (+ means a general ACL.)

share|improve this answer
+1 for being a programmer – Jan 8 '11 at 10:59
@taspeotis: The OP originally posted this on SO, so it seems it got programmers' attention too. :-P – Chris Jester-Young Jan 8 '11 at 15:36

I had the same question. It took me a while to find this, having browsed the "man ls" page a hundred times (well, maybe not that often) until I finally saw the note in the SEE ALSO section about using the command:

 info coreutils 'ls invocation'

In the section describing "-l" (--format=long):

 Following the file mode bits is a single character that specifies
 whether an alternate access method such as an access control list
 applies to the file.  When the character following the file mode
 bits is a space, there is no alternate access method.  When it is
 a printing character, then there is such a method.

 GNU `ls' uses a `.' character to indicate a file with an SELinux
 security context, but no other alternate access method.

 A file with any other combination of alternate access methods is
 marked with a `+' character.
share|improve this answer

It means the file has an access list with SELinux. Check out this topic, it tells you how to allow you to edit/change the file

share|improve this answer

Most likely this is due to an Access Control List (ACL) although I've only seen them shown as a + as in rw-rw-rw-+. Perhaps the . means a lack of an ACL on that file.

You can try typing getfacl . in the current directory to see what access controls those files might have.

share|improve this answer
Nope, the dot doesn't mean lack of ACLs - see other answers – Linker3000 Jan 8 '11 at 10:55

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.