Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've seen adverts for Hyper-V based virtualised servers, with as little as 512MB RAM. This seems quite small to me, but I'm wondering if anyone has experience of running a virtual server with this amount? Can windows really run efficiently with these specs?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Can windows really run efficiently with these specs?

No, but it will run acceptably with only a handful of services, and under low load.

The biggest performance bottleneck will be the operating system paging between disk and such a limited amount of RAM. If the virtual hard drive is on a very fast disk array then performance may be more acceptable.

share|improve this answer

I've run 2008R2 Virtual servers with 512MB RAM. Admittedly they weren't having a massive load put on them but they ran fine nevertheless.

This was also in VirtualBox though, not in Hyper-V.

The minimum reccomended RAM for 2008R2 is 512MB, depending on the server edition it will support up to 2TB.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .