Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've seen adverts for Hyper-V based virtualised servers, with as little as 512MB RAM. This seems quite small to me, but I'm wondering if anyone has experience of running a virtual server with this amount? Can windows really run efficiently with these specs?

share|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

Can windows really run efficiently with these specs?

No, but it will run acceptably with only a handful of services, and under low load.

The biggest performance bottleneck will be the operating system paging between disk and such a limited amount of RAM. If the virtual hard drive is on a very fast disk array then performance may be more acceptable.

share|improve this answer

I've run 2008R2 Virtual servers with 512MB RAM. Admittedly they weren't having a massive load put on them but they ran fine nevertheless.

This was also in VirtualBox though, not in Hyper-V.

The minimum reccomended RAM for 2008R2 is 512MB, depending on the server edition it will support up to 2TB.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.