Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Recently I upgraded to Comcast Business and their modem has a built-in router so I took off my DD-WRT router and moved to a location in my home where I needed more ports and Wi-Fi (preferably without running new Ethernet cables since it's 50-100 foot run through floor and ceilings).

I have my network cable from my Comcast modem going into Port 1 of my DD-WRT router with Port 2 and 3 being networked PCs. I have DD-WRT setup as a DHCP forwarder with the firewall disabled. This lets my all of my devices access the network fine. Is the correct the way to do this? Or is this a less optimal solution and it should be done in a slightly different way?

share|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

If you're OK with the Comcast modem's firewalling capabilities then that sounds fine. If it were my network, I would disable the modem's routing and do all the NAT'ing on the DD-WRT router because I'm picky about my firewall rules.

share|improve this answer
Sadly it seems my DD-WRT can't handle using about 100% of my bandwidth in full duplex on bittorrent without causing http traffic to be brought to a crawl (I already up'd the connection limit to 4096) one of my other posts I considered getting a business class router or building one with Untangle but everything seems fine with my new modem I still might be an Untangle server later on to handle advanced routing/QoS etc. – Chris Marisic Aug 17 '09 at 12:36

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.