Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am tired of watching fsck check my filesystem when my eeepc 901 shuts down abruptly due to a crash. I know that with a journaling filesystem, I won't have to wait for a check. However, I am well aware of the poor I/O performance of the SSD, so I can imagine using a journaling filesystem being even more frustrating, since there will be constant writes to the journal?

I will buy a new laptop without such a crummy ssd someday but, is there anything I can do now, on the software side of things?

share|improve this question
What are you on now? ext2/3 are older than ext4, and ext4 was made in the knowledge of ssds. – tobylane Feb 14 '11 at 17:40
You might also want to read Aligning filesystems to an SSD’s erase block size by Theodore Ts'o (one the men behind ext4). – Cristian Ciupitu Feb 15 '11 at 1:28
"I am well aware of the poor I/O performance of the SSD" - Are you sure? My SSD is for sure way faster than my (fake) RAID-10. – maaartinus Feb 15 '11 at 5:14
@tobylane i'm on ext2 – freedrull Feb 15 '11 at 6:12
@maaartinus This model has a 4gb master ssd, and a 16gb slave. The slave drive is much slower.… – freedrull Feb 15 '11 at 6:15

try with ReiserFS - checking fs is very fast. This is my fs of choice - rock solid

share|improve this answer
But will it be constantly writing to the journal? This could be a problem since the ssd is so slow... – freedrull Feb 14 '11 at 23:46

There are log-structured file systems available, like LogFS and NilFS that may be more performant on your SSD, but I'm unsure of their stability.

share|improve this answer

Another filesystem to try is btrFS. According to one of the main developers of ext3 and ext4, ext4 was actually intended more of a gateway between ext3 and btrFS (much like Microsoft's failed Windows ME transition from dos-based to NT-based). btrFS is still not at a "stable" release, but I hear it is very stable.

--EDIT-- By not "stable" but stable, I mean I don't know of any serious problems that would affect someone who uses a system normally. It's still considered a development version, but it's fairly polished.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.