vote up 2 vote down star

I feel Windows 7 is very fast but I'm using Vista for most of my gaming and it is really slow. Now I don't know if I should go back to XP or migrate to Windows 7 to play games and record videos while playing.

flag

closed by Jeff Atwood Aug 19 at 2:31

7 Answers

vote up 3 vote down

That's subjective.

Benchmarks show XP edges out 7 for performance.

However - Windows 7 supports Direct X 10, and 11 so games will look better.

I use 7 for games, and aside from the odd hiccup because it's not yet release so no-one offers support, it's fine.

link|flag
vote up 1 vote down

For an actual verdict on gaming comparisons between Win7 and XP, I would say it is too early to judge. For it to be a proper contest I would even go so far as to wait for SP1 for Win7. Who knows what will happen to an OS before/after it gets its first major revision.

But I would suggest moving to Win7 for future proofing mainly (DX 10, 11 etc..). XP is still does its job well, but its age does show.

link|flag
vote up 1 vote down

Go with Windows 7. For more speed get more RAM and Windows 7 64-bit to handle it.

link|flag
64-bit isn't going to help a ton. I'm definitely think everyone should get 64-bit Windows, and I use it exclusively. However, it may be misleading to infer that the increased RAM that 64-bit can handle will help games. I have yet to see a 64-bit game, which means that the 32-bit game will still have the memory limitations of a 32-bit system (2GB per app in most cases). It will definitely increase performance in multitasking with various other 32-bit apps. But if a single game is the only app running, then 64-bit + RAM won't give you a boost. (You should still get x64 for many other reasons) – MarkM Aug 19 at 1:31
My gaming box has 8 gigs of ram, and there are very certainly a few games out now that will use that if it's there. I seem to have the side-effect that said games take longer to load than people with 32bit setups. – salmonmoose Aug 19 at 7:59
@MarkM: You are correct, my short answer was less than complete. For the best gaming experience (with the least amount of debt), most boxes playing modern games will need at least 4GB of RAM. You can do okay with less, but probably not. In order to access all this RAM you'll need a 64-bit OS and I've heard nothing good about XP x64. Of course, if your games don't work with 7, don't use 7. – valbaca Dec 15 at 3:07
vote up 1 vote down

Well i think Windows 7 is better for gaming , first because of the Superfetch feature in Seven , i don't know how to explain why but try it yourself... disable it and run a game.. then enable it and run the same game... you will notice a difference in the timing between the sound and the visuals... of course it depends on your VGA card and your RAM.. but still it makes a noticeable difference..

And second , of course the DX 10 and 11 support but you should keep in mind that you need a decent VGA card and a good amount of RAM to run a game with DX 10 or 11.... of course all that in the future... because i think there's no game right now is fully supporting DX 10 or 11..

link|flag
Plenty of games have DX10 support. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… – MarkM Aug 19 at 1:33
vote up 0 vote down

If you know your games are compatible with Windows 7, then do it. If your games aren't compatible with Windows 7, then I would recommend downgrading to XP. I've used XP and Vista and XP is definitely faster.

link|flag
vote up 0 vote down

The bench marks have shown XP is faster but as posted before, it will not have DX 11 support.

link|flag
vote up 0 vote down

Old gaming : windows xp and sometimes linux handle the job with wine or a xp virtual machine on it ... (wine even work with pre-xp games for retrogaming love !!!)

Hardcore gaming : seem a easy guest but even if windows 7 as directx 10 like vista some games won't work sometimes and even more for xp games, like xp games on vista but 2 times worse ...

So I got no preference at all for any os, I choose by my needs for that time !!!

For benchmarks xp and 7 shine but 7 is slower for browsing and consume more ressources also, but it's the easiest windows os that I have seen but it still use 2 time more power than xp but I cannot compare after you have installed xp like you like cause windows 7 add new features that before we added to windows xp after and it surely cost some ressources ... As all choices vary, it can cost less or more than a plain windows 7 ...

link|flag
What VM platform are you using that has hardware 3D acceleration support? If you're talking about games that don't need that you're talking about oooold games. – MarkM Aug 19 at 1:34

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.