Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a folder full of stuff that I sync across all my computers and virtual machines. It contains a whole load of stuff, including portable applications.

On a new OS installation, I run a batch script which (amongst other things) copies a folder of shortcuts, for these portable applications, to the start menu (all users).

As this synced folder is constantly changing, when I have added or removed portable apps, these shortcuts need to be updated across all my machines.

I have been a scripts that runs as a scheduled task, to keep them updated, but it would be much better if I could use symbolic links. However, this does seem to work properly.

When I make a symlink in the start menu folder, pointing to the folder of shortcuts within the synced folder, they do all appear in the start menu, but they do not appear in the start menu search box when I search for them.

I have tried adding the R (read-only) attribute to the symlink, as the other folders in the start menu have that, but that does not help.

I have also added the target folder to the list of indexed folder, but that does not help either. Actually, I am glad that this was not the solution, as Windows Server 2008 R2 does not use that service unless the file server role is installed.

So, is there any way top make the start menu search include application shortcuts that are included in the start menu through a symbolic link?

share|improve this question
1  
This works handsomely with Dropbox: on any new computer, I can use two symlinks, and I have a complete collection of my commonly used apps with working shortcuts and configuration. Thanks for asking this! –  dawmail333 Mar 16 '12 at 6:27

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Create a junction instead, e.g. mklink /j link target. I just tested it and it appears to work handsomely.

I'm not quite sure why symlinks are not searched, but I suspect they might really be files.

share|improve this answer
    
It works. I didn't think of doing that. Thanks a lot! –  paradroid Mar 8 '11 at 20:09

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.