Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have the belief that Internet Explorer 9 unable to run on Windows XP is really marketing. But I want to ask you if there really is a technical reason why Microsoft didn't release Internet Explorer 9 on Windows XP?

share|improve this question
15  
Probably because mainstream support for XP was discontinued in April 2010. –  Hydaral Mar 17 '11 at 1:24
    
Damn. That means I have to buy a new operating system just so I can carry on testing my web pages in all the IE versions. –  Matt Gibson Mar 17 '11 at 11:01
2  
@MattGibson I'm trying to convince my boss to buy me a new computer because of this :-) –  Patrick Mar 17 '11 at 12:29
1  
@Matt: “I have to buy a new operating system just so I can carry on testing my web pages in all the IE versions.” — I understand the frustration, but “just”? How much does Windows 7 cost, and how much money do you earn from making web pages? I suspect it’s worth it. Also note that Microsoft provides Virtual PC images of Windows XP with IE 6/7/8 installed on them for testing purposes. This run in Virtual PC (which is free) on Windows 7 Professional, and VMWare on Mac OS X. –  Paul D. Waite Mar 17 '11 at 15:50
2  
@Paul I earn very little from web design; that's a spare-time hobby/learning exercise more than anything else; my paid day gig is data warehousing. In my case, in fact, it's probably not worth it until the next paying job comes along. I'll look into those VM images, though, thanks for the pointer! At the moment I'm using VirtualBox with IETester which meets my minimal requirements. I guess I find the thought of an upgrade extra-annoying because I only use Windows for about an hour every month, at home... –  Matt Gibson Mar 17 '11 at 16:02

5 Answers 5

up vote 55 down vote accepted

Internet Explorer 9 makes use of two features available in Windows Vista and Windows 7, Direct2D and DirectWrite to speed up the user experience and they are unavailable in Windows XP. There are some minor security features that rely on the newer OS's security models and also make it incompatible with Windows XP.

Get the full down low at Ars Technica - The most modern browser there is: Internet Explorer 9 reviewed.

share|improve this answer
14  
@ChrisF I think Microsoft is starting a determined push to get people to stop using their outdated software. Between writing some of their newer software only for Vista/7 to actually encouraging people to stop using Internet Explorer 6 they are getting serious. –  Patrick Mar 16 '11 at 17:51
1  
Also, microsoft stands to benefit by releasing a newer browser on their newer operating systems, as users who are interested in the security benefits will need to upgrade operating systems, leading directly to sales of microsoft products. –  zzzzBov Mar 16 '11 at 20:09
6  
@zzzzBov true, but many of the programs today that run on top of Unix or Linux would not run on the earlier versions of their respective OS. And even though XP SP3 came out just a few years ago, the underpinnings of the operating system are 10 years old. Imagine trying to run the latest software on Ubuntu 4.10, which btw, Canonical stopped supporting in 2006. –  Patrick Mar 16 '11 at 20:42
2  
@Patrick, I don’t see how D3D/DW have any bearing since many people run Windows 7 on a video card that does not support DX10, so they are still unavailable anyway. Besides, acceleration isn’t really a technical reason since without it, pages could still run albeit slower (read the same speed as they have for the last 20 years). –  Synetech Mar 16 '11 at 22:49
2  
And the pinning thingy is not possible in XP. –  Bobby Alexander Mar 17 '11 at 8:53

Well, they could have written Internet Explorer 9 to work on Windows XP. Part of the reason is to move people away from Windows XP, but that's not JUST marketing, Windows XP really is outdated and full of security flaws. It's in everyone's best interest to ditch it, not just Microsoft and hardware vendors...

share|improve this answer

Ars Technica - Why Microsoft did the right thing in ditching Windows XP for Internet Explorer

The above article goes into more detail, there is shown that it also turns out that Firefox does support Direct2D & DirectWrite on Windows Vista & 7 but on Windows XP it falls back to software mode. But I wouldn't blame Microsoft for not writing this functionality into Internet Explorer 9...

share|improve this answer

MS, like many software companies, don't make decisions purely on technical bases. This decision, more than likely, was based on the costs of continuing support on older platforms, and the loss of sales of newer platforms. XP is ingrained in millions of desktop PCs sitting in offices and any small additional excuse to get these corporate IT behemoths to upgrade their Windows licenses is going to be a strategic move for MS.

share|improve this answer

The outdated kernel of Windows XP doesn't include new features that Internet Explorer 9 needs to function, such as Direct2D and a few others (mentioned in answers elsewhere).

However,they were able to work around it, but dude seriously, Windows XP now needs 3 more years to be teenager!

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.