Take the 2-minute tour ×
Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Found a way to really speed up Firefox - I've implemented it and noticed serious speed improvements. Can anyone comment ?

  1. Type in the Firefox address about:config
  2. Accept the Warning notification and continue
  3. At the top of the page will be a filter – search for, and adjust, the following settings:

network.http.pipelining: true
network.http.proxy.pipelining: true
network.http.max-connections: 50
network.http.max-connections-per-server: 40
network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-proxy: 20
network.http.max-persistent-connections-per-server: 10
network.http.pipelining.maxrequests: 20

  1. Then right-click anywhere in a blank space and select New –> Integer
  2. Name this integer “nglayout.initialpaint.delay” and set its value to 0.
  3. Right-click again anywhere in a blank space and select New –> Boolean
  4. Name this boolean “config.trim_on_minimize” and set its value to True.
  5. Now in the Icon Tray, right-click on the Mozilla Firefox Icon and select Properties
  6. Under “Target”, you will see the line “C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe”
  7. Change this line to “C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe” /Prefetch:1″
  8. Ensure that there is a space i.e. \firefox”(space)/Prefetch:1″

Got this off a website I found via Twitter (removed link; see history if you care...)

share|improve this question
    
and why this isnt standard in the browser from day dot ? i mean i am seeing significant increases in loadtime - and therefore during development –  Andy Jul 2 '09 at 13:59
    
They probably have a reason for it. Either security related or something else. Maybe the stability. –  Burkhard Jul 2 '09 at 14:00
2  
this isn't a question... –  faceless1_14 Aug 19 '09 at 20:42
1  
@faceless1_14, the question is in the third line. While this is a nice trick, he basically wants to know what the catch is. –  Brandon Aug 19 '09 at 20:43
add comment

migrated from stackoverflow.com Aug 19 '09 at 20:21

This question came from our site for professional and enthusiast programmers.

6 Answers

Take a look at this article by Asa Dotzler (a Mozilla dev). The downside to this is that not all websites will display correctly, and that while you see some content much faster than you normally would, overall the page takes longer to display.

A long time ago, I also found on another site a note which mentioned that changing the network settings also makes more requests than normal to the web server, and has led to websites banning people who use this hack because of the strain it puts on their servers.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Most if not all of these options will be tradeoffs.

A good reference is http://kb.mozillazine.org/Category:Preferences

share|improve this answer
add comment

It's probably overkill, but a friend of mine copies his ~/.mozilla to a tmpfs, runs Firefox on that directory, and copies it back every couple minutes in case the kernel panics.

share|improve this answer
    
I did that. It's slightly faster (for me). It might pay off when you have a rather slow HDD; on SSD I would say it's not worth the effort. –  Marco May 12 '12 at 16:32
add comment

The downside to pipelining is that is puts additional strain on the webserver you're requesting pages from. Just one person doing this isn't a big problem, but lots of people use this tweak. This is definitely a large contributor to the "Slashdot effect" where a smaller site will crash upon being linked to by a very popular site (like Slashdot, Digg, Reddit, etc etc). A ton of people are directed to that site, and if even 25% of them are pipelining than the server strain starts to increase almost exponentially.

Also, the numbers in those instructions are too high. Firefox caps the number of simultaneous HTTP requests anyway. I recall reading that the maximum was something like 8 or 16, but I could be wrong.

share|improve this answer
add comment

I personally have been using the FireFox extension FasterFox and it has made a marked improvement in my browser experience. I'm not 100% sure what all it changes, but it is a very easy process since it is a simple add-on.

share|improve this answer
add comment

The main problem here is pipelining. (That nglayout.initialpaint.delay is how fast Firefox displays data it has already received.)

Basically, when you set your pipelining data (non-proxy) to something like 50 (which is overkill), you are using the server-side connection speed of 50 different people. There's no downside for you, but the places you are going to will suffer.

Proxy pipelining is a little bit different, but it's basically the same issue. You'll place more strain on the proxy (bad if it's a public proxying service, ok if the proxy is your personal computer or only servicing a small number of people anyway).

If you really need the speed boost then you can probably set your pipelining values to something like 2 or 3, but really you don't need pipelining on at all. Those extra requests are wasted data in the end (server-side), because it will end up sending you multiple copies of your data.

Also, your internet connection as a whole might be adversely affected, because you'll be transferring much more data total. Your torrenting, downloading, updating, etc. might be affected.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.