Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Exactly how well does MSE perform alongside the other paid AV suites?

I've noticed that Norton and Kaspersky had jacked up their prices - previously I had purchased KIS 2010 3 years for ~$110, but now the prices have gone through the roof. I've tested out MSE on a laptop before removing Windows on it, but I'm planning to build a Windows-based desktop, so I would need to use MSE.

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Linker3000, Sathya Mar 28 '11 at 17:55

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

They all suck compared to user education. – Mar 27 '11 at 6:59

Purely anecdotal answer, but I've had trojans get through MSE that got stopped by McAfee. It's entirely possible that AVG or Avira (free solutions) would have stopped them as well, but MSE just doesn't cut it and I would never depend on it.

share|improve this answer

Pretty well from what I've seen, slightly slower with the real-time protection but still fast. You can see a bunch of AV comparisons on this site: AV Comparatives


Also just from looking at the tests I linked to it looks like KIS has no particular benifit over MSE, McAffe, or AVG.

Personally I user avast! and really like it, lots of options and is pretty good performance wise.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .