Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I received the error:

bash: syntax error near unexpected token `;'

due to the following command:

evince foo.pdf bar.pdf &; emacs foo.tex &

I is it illegal to separate commands with ; when using & to background a job? Or is there another reason this didn't work?

Thank you.

share|improve this question
up vote 26 down vote accepted

You don't need the semicolon. After it's sent to the background it's free to get another command.

evince foo.pdf bar.pdf & emacs foo.tex &
share|improve this answer
This helped me with an if statement after 2h of swearing. If anyone should need this: if [ $(ps -ef |grep -c '[p]grep') -eq 0 ]; then nohup sleep 5 > /dev/null 2>&1</dev/null & fi – Oktav Oct 15 '13 at 13:07

BTW, the core issue is that (Bourne-derived) shells do not allow empty commands.

";" and "&" are command terminators, meaning fg and bg respectively. So "; ;" (or ";" at the beginning of a line) is also invalid.

(Newline(s) imply ";" if there is a not-yet-terminated command, unless you use "\" to continue the line.)

Languages vary a lot on these policies:

C-derived languages allow empty statements.

Pascal and PERL have separators, not terminators.

share|improve this answer

No, it's just confused and can't work out quite what you mean.

You need to group the & with the command that you want to put in the background:

$ (evince foo.pdf bar.pdf &); emacs foo.tex &

That works fine. Even more explicit would be:

$ (evince foo.pdf bar.pdf &); (emacs foo.tex &)

Especially if you then wanted to chain more commands after the end as well.

share|improve this answer
Thanks for the input. I think I see why it balked. – KennyPeanuts Apr 11 '11 at 14:42
There's no need to spawn a subshell just to justify the use of an unnecessary semi-colon. Parentheses aren't just syntax; they cause extra work to be done. – chepner Jun 8 '12 at 15:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .