Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I've gotten two reports of Outlook freezing since changing the structure of an email I send to use image sources like:


instead of:

Is this possible or is it a coincidence (2 reports out of 150k emails - but we've never had this reported before the change)?

share|improve this question

migrated from Apr 14 '11 at 20:56

This question came from our site for system and network administrators.

Perhaps Outlook is treating them as UNC paths rather than URLs and freezing during the unsuccessful attempt to access the host as a file server? – Kevin Reid Apr 15 '11 at 0:02
I've confirmed that this will freeze most versions of Outlook. I'm amazed that hackers aren't exploiting this. – Adam Nelson May 19 '11 at 22:36
up vote 2 down vote accepted

I've had problems with links like this in Outlook when Internet Explorer is not the default browser. In my case the user had Chrome as the default browser and Outlook was hanging handing over the link to Chrome - it did eventually load the image, but it would take literally 5 minutes of being non-responsive.

Anyway, I would have thought that you really should be specifying the protocol in the hyperlink as best practice, but I'm not sure it will make much difference in this case

share|improve this answer
To be clear, these are attributes in the image tag like this, not hrefs: <img src="//" /> – Adam Nelson Apr 14 '11 at 20:47
Can you believe it: nothing has really changed since early 2011 (as of end of 2015)! I stumbled upon it in my work. No. Outlook still doesn't support protocol relative links. Whereas 'best practices' Jon Reeves talked about would be to use them rather than not. – Andrevinsky Nov 6 '15 at 11:08

This is a known bug in Outlook 2010 (see here a Microsoft rep recognizes this). You can download the hotfix (that only took them 2 years to publish :-) ) here.

share|improve this answer

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .