Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Some days ago, I installed ArchLinux on my HP 8200 Elite because it's one of the distros that actually work with my new hardware.

Now I wanted to run an Xorg-server which works perfectly using vesa as driver. But as I have an ATI Radeon HD 6570, I would like to use the original proprietary driver from ATI.

Therefore I followed the instructions on Arch's Wiki for ATI Catalyst in the section about the custom kernels. Perfectly created and installed the package without any error. The only thing I changed was to build the original arch-kernel again but adding some Intel network drivers, that's why I need the custom kernel.

Trying to start the xserver with the original fglrx-driver ends up in a segfault when running startx

Here's my /etc/X11/xorg.conf:

Section "Monitor"
    Identifier "Monitor0"

Section "Device"
    Identifier  "Device0"
#   Driver      "vesa"
#   ^- with this option it works
    Driver      "fglrx"

Section "Screen"
    Identifier  "Screen0"
    Device      "Device0"
    Monitor     "Monitor0"
    DefaultDepth    16
    SubSection  "Display"
        Depth   16
        Modes   "1920x1200" # runs in 1600x1200 only in VESA-mode?!

To not spam up the post, here's the /var/log/Xorg.0.log

# uname -a
Linux myhost #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 23 13:57:07 CEST 2011 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.4GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux

If you need more information about my architecture, let me know.

Any idea why this is happening or what I could do against is really appreciated.

share|improve this question
up vote 0 down vote accepted

Don't use fglrx. Use the open-source ATI driver, which seems to be called xf86-video-ati on Arch Linux. This will work perfectly fine unless of course you plan to run games on this machine.

share|improve this answer
Tried that one, too. It moans about not having any screens found. Well is it because I run Xorg 1.10 instead of 1.9? And I would like to run 3D-stuff on it. Not only games, but just OpenGL-applications – Atmocreations Apr 24 '11 at 15:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.