Super User is a question and answer site for computer enthusiasts and power users. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am currently investigating how to set up virtualization on my laptop but I am having trouble finding a good source of information about what different virtualization technology is good at and how it works.

There are a number of products on the market including:

  • Xen
  • KVM
  • VMWare
  • Virtual Box
  • OpenVZ
  • Hyper V

What are the main differences between these in terms of how they work and what they are used for?

As far as I can tell there are some major variables that differentiate the various products:

  • Cost
  • Operating System Support
  • Performance
  • Hardware support (i.e. graphics, usb)
  • Extra features (such as snapshots)

There is also other technology that seems to be commonly referred to in discussions about virtualization, but never explained how everything fits in.

  • QEMU

It would be good to get an explanation of virtualization principles how those relate to the available products out there.

  • Virtualization
  • Virtual Machine
  • Hypervisor
  • Paravirtualization
  • Hardware Virtualization

This question is worded pretty badly so I'll be changing it in time, I just wanted to be able to throw down ideas here while they are in my head. There really wasn't anything out there that explained the concepts and tied everything together so that readers can make an informed decision about what technology they use.

share|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

The main difference between all those solutions is the same reason as why there are so many car companies - it is a big market and everyone thinks they can do it better.

As for your comparison points, everyone will give different answers. Typically, if you just want to mess around and know what you are doing, I would recommend Virtual Box. If you want to do more advanced things, I would recommend VMWare Workstation, if you do not know what you are doing, but just want to virtualise, I would recommend Microsoft Virtual PC.

Qemu is not virtualisation, it is emulation. this means it is slower, but it has its moments and its niche that other products do not fit in to.

As for your direct points:


The process of running a machine virtually, this is the general name of the topic.

Virtual Machine

A name for a single machine that runs virtually on a host.


A hypervisor is a virtualisation technology which allows for the greatest performance by attempting to run as thin as possible on top of the bare metal hardware.


This term is very awkward and is subjective to different people. Typically, most modern virtualisation technology, even those that use a Hypervisor also use paravirtualisation for a few hardware components (e.g. networking controller.). My definition (which I am happy to be corrected on) is presenting virtual hardware which is different to the physical hardware it is actually connected to.

Hardware Virtualization

(typically) Support for virtualisation is built in to the processor directly which increases the performance. For example, in the early days of virtualisation, it was performed via emulation which has extra overhead. Hardware virtualisation is basically a bunch of "shortcuts" inside the processor that allow virtual machines to run a lot faster - in some cases, almost at the same speed as a native machine.

I hope this helps!

share|improve this answer
Thanks Wil. I'll leave this question open to get some more feedback. It would be good to see some comparisons between the products in terms of what technology they use and how their features differ. I've been able to find a lot of material on individual topics regarding virtualization but nothing that ties it all together well; on that front I am still searching. – Daniel Apr 26 '11 at 12:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .