If a Mac OS X user already has HomeBrew installed, is there any advantage to installing Git via the .dmg files for OS X linked from the Git download page rather than via HomeBrew?
|
feedback
|
|
I don't think there's much of a difference, although running
works unattended and is way faster and easier than
Apart from that, Homebrew currently seems to have Git 1.7.5, whereas the downloadable Git OS X installer only has 1.7.4.4 | ||||
|
feedback
|
|
IIRC, Git is required for Homebrew to work, so you most likely already have it. Let's ignore that for a while... From the installer readme:
and creates a new directory tree containing It also includes some Perl and Python stuff, probably dependencies so it's self-contained. You can use suspicious package to see what's inside. There is no real package management, i.e. you likely need to re-download und run the installer for all updates, and the uninstaller is a very short shell script. The Homebrew version installs to I can't see any reason to install | ||||
|
feedback
|
brew upgradeand don't need to care about downloading an installer and running it etc. :-) – Daniel Beck May 5 '11 at 18:07